A hybrid indicator for realistic blurred image quality assessment

被引:4
作者
Yu, Shaode [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jiayi [1 ]
Gu, Jiacheng [1 ]
Jin, Mingxue [1 ]
Ma, Yunling [1 ]
Yang, Lijuan [3 ]
Li, Jianguang [1 ]
机构
[1] Commun Univ China, Sch Informat & Commun Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Commun Univ China, State Key Lab Media Convergence & Commun, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Minjiang Univ, Dept Surveying & Mapping Engn, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Image quality assessment; Realistic blur; Feature selection; Machine learning; SHARPNESS ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvcir.2023.103848
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Blurriness is annoying yet common in digital images. Many sharpness assessment indicators using handcrafted features achieve impressive results on synthesized blurring images, while room exists for improvement on realistic datasets. This study presents a hybrid indicator in which no-reference indicators perform as mid-level feature extractors and their outputs are selected using a consensus-based method for discriminative ones. On realistic image datasets, 15 off-the-shelf indicators are explored, and experimental results reveal that the hybrid indicator obtains considerable improvement (>= 21.5%, BID2011; >= 11.6%, CID2013; >= 7.1%, LIVE Challenge; and >= 11.6%, KonIQ-10k) compared to the baseline indicator. Meanwhile, the indicator requires more features for representation of diverse distortions (CID2013, LIVE Challenge and KonIQ-10k) than different blurriness (BID2011). Four regression models are investigated, and fitting neural network leads to overall better results. Realistic image quality assessment is challenging, fusion of existing indicators improves the performance, while to develop advanced indicators remains desirable.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [31] Liu JZ, 2022, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2207.08124
  • [32] Blind Quality Assessment of Camera Images Based on Low-Level and High-Level Statistical Features
    Liu, Yutao
    Gu, Ke
    Wang, Shiqi
    Zhao, Debin
    Gao, Wen
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, 2019, 21 (01) : 135 - 146
  • [33] Quality assessment for real out-of-focus blurred images
    Liu, Yutao
    Gu, Ke
    Zhai, Guangtao
    Liu, Xianming
    Zhao, Debin
    Gao, Wen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION AND IMAGE REPRESENTATION, 2017, 46 : 70 - 80
  • [34] Perceptual blur and ringing metrics: application to JPEG2000
    Marziliano, P
    Dufaux, F
    Winkler, S
    Ebrahimi, T
    [J]. SIGNAL PROCESSING-IMAGE COMMUNICATION, 2004, 19 (02) : 163 - 172
  • [35] A No-Reference Image Blur Metric Based on the Cumulative Probability of Blur Detection (CPBD)
    Narvekar, Niranjan D.
    Karam, Lina J.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2011, 20 (09) : 2678 - 2683
  • [36] Nogueira S., 2017, J. Mach. Learn Res, V18, P6345
  • [37] Image feature subsets for predicting the quality of consumer camera images and identifying quality dimensions
    Nuutinen, Mikko
    Virtanen, Toni
    Oittinen, Pirkko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC IMAGING, 2014, 23 (06)
  • [38] No-Reference Sharpness Assessment of Camera-Shaken Images by Analysis of Spectral Structure
    Oh, Taegeun
    Park, Jincheol
    Seshadrinathan, Kalpana
    Lee, Sanghoon
    Bovik, Alan Conrad
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2014, 23 (12) : 5428 - 5439
  • [39] Ponomarenko Nikolay, 2013, 2013 4th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP), P106
  • [40] Ponomarenko N., 2009, ADV MOD RADIOELECTRO, V10, P30