The Environmental Responsibility Framework: A Toolbox for Recognizing and Promoting Ecologically Conscious Research

被引:2
作者
Murray, Desneiges S. [1 ]
Cole, Isabel [2 ]
Nunez, Nicholas [1 ]
Parker, Eric M. [1 ]
Mikulis, Anna [1 ]
Herreid, Allison M. [1 ]
Donovan, Mitchell [3 ]
Fazekas, Hannah M. [1 ]
Wymore, Adam S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Hampshire, Dept Nat Resources & Environm, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[2] Univ New Hampshire, Dept Agr Nutr & Food Sci, Durham, NH USA
[3] Terra Informat LLC, Dover, NH USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
ethics; responsibility; science; environment; sustainable; framework;
D O I
10.1029/2022EF002964
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ethical guidelines have provided a cornerstone for morally appropriate research on human or other vertebrate animal subjects since at least 1945. By contrast, although there are environmental impacts associated with all science research activities (including field, laboratory, and computational projects), no comprehensive guiding framework to determine environmentally responsible research practices has been proposed. Drawing from existing models within social, medical, and animal sciences, we propose a framework for explicitly incorporating environmentally focused ethics into scientific research. The Environmental Responsibility 5-R Framework ((ERF)-F-5) is centered around Recognition, Refinement, Reduction, Replacement, and Restoration. (ERF)-F-5 starts with Recognizing that research can have environmental consequences, while each subsequent "R" serves as an opportunity for acknowledging, evaluating, and mitigating the environmental impacts of scientific research. These R's include: Refining research questions, Reducing the resources and energy consumed, Replacing materials with sustainable options and altering methods, and in the case of field research, Restoring an environment to mitigate any harm done. By introducing this novel and approachable framework, we strive to promote enhanced awareness across the entire scientific community by encouraging researchers to recognize their responsibility and identify potential mitigation opportunities for the environmental consequences of their research activities. We affirm that in doing so, scientists can more effectively balance the dual goals of maximizing their novel research outputs while minimizing possible harm to the environment.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Recent Growth and Expansion of Birch Shrubs Across a Low Arctic Landscape in Continental Canada: Are These Responses More a Consequence of the Severely Declining Caribou Herd than of Climate Warming? [J].
Andruko, Rhett ;
Danby, Ryan ;
Grogan, Paul .
ECOSYSTEMS, 2020, 23 (07) :1362-1379
[2]   A clean, green science machine [J].
不详 .
NATURE, 2015, 519 (7543) :261-261
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, UR ACT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, AW TUP WHANG RIV CLA
[5]   Supporting resurgent Indigenous-led governance: A nascent mechanism for just and effective conservation [J].
Artelle, Kyle A. ;
Zurba, Melanie ;
Bhattacharyya, Jonaki ;
Chan, Diana E. ;
Brown, Kelly ;
Housty, Jess ;
Moola, Faisal .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 240
[6]   Reducing the ecological impact of computing through education and Python']Python compilers [J].
Augier, Pierre ;
Bolz-Tereick, Carl Friedrich ;
Guelton, Serge ;
Mohanan, Ashwin Vishnu .
NATURE ASTRONOMY, 2021, 5 (04) :334-335
[7]  
Baskin Cyndy., 2005, CANADIAN SOCIAL WORK, V22, P171
[8]   The digital revolution of Earth-system science [J].
Bauer, Peter ;
Dueben, Peter D. ;
Hoefler, Torsten ;
Quintino, Tiago ;
Schulthess, Thomas C. ;
Wedi, Nils P. .
NATURE COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, 2021, 1 (02) :104-113
[9]  
Cohen J., 1992, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V1, P98, DOI [10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783, DOI 10.1111/1467-8721.EP10768783]
[10]  
Colston-Nepali, 2019, THESIS QUEENS U CANA