A comparison of two in vitro bioassays to detect resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus to fipronil

被引:4
|
作者
Torrents, Jorgelina [1 ]
Morel, Nicolas [2 ]
Rossner, Maria, V [3 ]
Martinez, Norberto C. [4 ]
Nava, Santiago [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Litoral, Fac Ciencias Vet, Kreder 2805, RA-3080 Esperanza, Santa Fe, Argentina
[2] Inst Nacl Tecnol Agr, Inst Invest Cadena Lactea IDICAL, INTA CONICET, Estn Expt Agr Rafaela, CC 22, RA-2300 Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina
[3] Inst Nacl Tecnol Agr, Estn Expt Agr Colonia Benitez, Colonia Benitez, Chaco, Argentina
[4] Agencia Extens Rural Garabato, Inst Nacl Tecnol Agr, Garabato, Santa Fe, Argentina
来源
VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY- REGIONAL STUDIES AND REPORTS | 2023年 / 37卷
关键词
Resistance; Rhipicephalus microplus; Firponil; Bioassay; BOOPHILUS-MICROPLUS; DISCRIMINATING CONCENTRATIONS; ACARI IXODIDAE; 1ST REPORT; INSECTICIDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.vprsr.2022.100816
中图分类号
R38 [医学寄生虫学]; Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ; 100103 ;
摘要
The aim of this work is to compare the sensitivity of two in vitro bioassays to detect resistant to fipronil in Argentinean populations of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus. Two different larval bioassays prepared with technical grade (97%) fipronil were compared: larval immersion test (LIT) and larval packet test (LPT). Seven strains from different provinces were treated with both assays. Colonia Tabay, Colonia Benitez, Intiyaco and Quimili strains were considered resistant in both LIT and LPT bioassays. The 95% confidence intervals (IC95) for lethal concentration 50% (LC50) did not overlap with the susceptible reference strain (SRS) and all the values of RR50 obtained were higher than 2. Garabato and Federal strains were considered as susceptible for both techniques because the IC95 for the LC50 overlapped with those of the SRS and the RR50 values were lesser than 2. An ambiguous situation occurs with Reconquista strain. This strain was considered as susceptible with LPT and with incipient resistant after LIT trial. The analysis of the results indicates that both LIT and LPT trials have enough sensibility to differentiate resistant and susceptible strains, but LIT was more sensitive than LPT when the resistance is incipient.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] In vitro diagnosis of the first case of amitraz resistance in Rhipicephalus microplus in Santo Tome (Corrientes), Argentina
    Cutulle, Christian
    Lovis, Leonore
    Ines D'Agostino, Beatriz
    Gerardo Balbiani, Gabriel
    Morici, Gabriel
    Citroni, Daniel
    Reggi, Julio
    Luis Caracostantogolo, Jorge
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2013, 192 (1-3) : 296 - 300
  • [42] Evaluation of synergism in essential oils against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus in Burkina Faso
    Coulibaly, Anass
    Biguezoton, Abel S.
    Hema, Delphine M.
    Dah, Firmin F.
    Sawadogo, Ignace
    Bationo, Remy K.
    Compaore, Moussa
    Kiendrebeogo, Martin
    Nebie, Roger C. H.
    EXPERIMENTAL PARASITOLOGY, 2023, 255
  • [43] Monitoring the resistance of Rhipicephalus microplus to amitraz, flumethrin, coumaphos, and ivermectin on cattle farms in Mexico
    Rodriguez-Vivas, Roger I.
    Espan, Eduardo Ramirez
    Blanco, Ivan Lozano
    Ojeda-Chi, Melina M.
    Trinidad-Martinez, Iris
    Islas, Juan Agustin Torres
    Bhushan, Chandra
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY- REGIONAL STUDIES AND REPORTS, 2021, 26
  • [44] Immune recognition of salivary proteins from the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus differs according to the genotype of the bovine host
    Garcia, Gustavo Rocha
    Maruyama, Sandra Regina
    Nelson, Kristina T.
    Chaves Ribeiro, Jose Marcos
    Gardinassi, Luiz Gustavo
    Mendes Maia, Antonio Augusto
    Ferreira, Beatriz Rossetti
    Kooyman, Frans N. J.
    de Miranda Santos, Isabel K. F.
    PARASITES & VECTORS, 2017, 10
  • [45] Multiplex allele-specific polymerase chain reaction to detect kdr and rdl mutations in the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae)
    Castro-Janer, Eleonor A.
    Klafke, Guilherme M.
    Diaz, Andre
    Fontes, Florencia
    Baraibar, Florencia
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2021, 292
  • [46] Stochastic modelling to predict a priori the potential outcomes of different control schemes against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus
    Miotti, Camila
    Morel, Nicolas
    Signorini, Marcelo Lisandro
    Nava, Santiago
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2024, 326
  • [47] Analysis of Bm86 conserved epitopes: is a global vaccine against Cattle Tick Rhipicephalus microplus possible?
    Zaidan Blecha, Isabella Maiumi
    Csordas, Barbara Guimaraes
    Rangel Aguirre, Andre de Abreu
    Cunha, Rodrigo Casquero
    Garcia, Marcos Valerio
    Andreotti, Renato
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PARASITOLOGIA VETERINARIA, 2018, 27 (03): : 267 - 279
  • [48] Acaricides containing zein nanoparticles: A tool for a lower impact control of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus
    Figueiredo, Amanda
    Anholeto, Luis Adriano
    Cola, Diego Faria
    Fantatto, Rafaela Regina
    Gainza, Yousmel Aleman
    dos Santos, Isabella Barbosa
    Vicozzi, Gabriel Pedroso
    Avila, Daiana Silva
    Fraceto, Leonardo Fernandes
    Chagas, Ana Carolina de Souza
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2023, 318
  • [49] Comparative analyses of the mitochondrial genomes of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus clades A and B from China
    Deng, Yuan-Ping
    Yi, Jia-Ning
    Fu, Yi-Tian
    Nie, Yu
    Zhang, Yu
    Liu, Guo-Hua
    PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH, 2022, 121 (06) : 1789 - 1797
  • [50] Biological parameters of two strains (acaricide resistant and susceptible) of the tick Rhipicephalus microplus
    Dalla Rosa, Luciana
    de Moura, Anderson Barbosa
    de Souza, Antonio Pereira
    Bellato, Valdomiro
    Sartor, Amelia Aparecida
    Trevisani, Natascha
    Scott, Fabio Barbour
    SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2013, 34 (05): : 2357 - 2362