Differential diagnostic value of magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient for renal clear cell carcinoma and non-clear cell carcinoma

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Xiaozhong [1 ,3 ]
Xiang, Xuyang [2 ]
Lin, Hui Ting [2 ]
机构
[1] Gansu Univ Chinese Med, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, Peoples R China
[2] Gansu Univ Chinese Med, Clin Med Sch 1, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
[3] Gansu Univ Chinese Med, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp, 732 Jiayuguan West Rd, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, Peoples R China
关键词
non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma; MRI; clear cell renal cell carcinoma; diffusion-weighted imaging; apparent diffusion coefficient; differential diagnosis; BOSNIAK CLASSIFICATION; CONTRAST; MRI; CT; ULTRASOUND; BENIGN; MASSES;
D O I
10.3892/ol.2022.13647
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Accurate identification of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes before surgery is important to determine appropriate surgical methods and clinical prognosis. The objective of the present study was to investigate the differential diagnostic value of magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (MRI-DWI) and the measured apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in clear cell (cc) RCC and non-ccRCC. Imaging data (DWI and ADC) from 100 patients with pathologically confirmed RCC from March 2018 to March 2021 in Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, (Lanzhou, China) were retrospectively analyzed, including 32 cases of non-ccRCC (21 cases of chromophobe and 11 cases of papillary cell carcinoma) and 68 cases of ccRCC. Patients underwent MRI examination, including high and low B-value DWI, to compare the imaging features of the two RCC subtypes and the ADC values of tumor sites were measured. The results of the DWI and ADC were statistically different between the two RCC subtypes (P<0.01). The DWI of ccRCC was primarily low, equal or slightly high signal. ADC of ccRCC was mainly equal or slightly high signal and the high B-value DWI signal was lower than the low B-value DWI. DWI of non-ccRCC was mostly obviously high signal. ADC of non-ccRCC was mostly uniform, obviously low signal and the high B-value DWI signal was markedly higher than the low B-value DWI. The ADC values of non-ccRCC were lower than those of ccRCC, and the ADC values <1.42 +/- 0.48x10(-3) mm(2)/s were mostly non-ccRCC. In conclusion, MRI-DWI and ADC can be used to differentiate subtypes of RCC to determine appropriate surgical methods and clinical prognosis.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Renal cell carcinoma: applicability of the apparent coefficient of the diffusion-weighted estimated by MRI for improving their differential diagnosis, histologic subtyping, and differentiation grade
    Mytsyk, Yulian
    Dutka, Ihor
    Borys, Yuriy
    Komnatska, Iryna
    Shatynska-Mytsyk, Iryna
    Farooqi, Ammad Ahmad
    Gazdikova, Katarina
    Caprnda, Martin
    Rodrigo, Luis
    Kruzliak, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 49 (02) : 215 - 224
  • [22] Comparative diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma
    Ping Zhao
    Jianing Zhu
    Lanke Wang
    Nan Li
    Xinghua Zhang
    Jinfeng Li
    Yukun Luo
    Qiuyang Li
    European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 3766 - 3774
  • [23] The value of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the differential diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma and nodular goiter
    Ai, Zhao Dong
    Yu, Xiao Ping
    Hou, Ling
    Liu, Jun
    Lu, Qiang
    Zhang, Zhi Yuan
    Chen, Jie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2022, 15 (02): : 61 - 67
  • [24] Systemic treatment of the metastatic renal cell carcinoma: usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient of diffusion-weighted MRI in prediction of early therapeutic response
    Yulian Mytsyk
    Serhiy Pasichnyk
    Ihor Dutka
    Ihor Dats
    Dmytro Vorobets
    Michał Skrzypczyk
    Yerzhan Uteuliyev
    Andrea Botikova
    Katarina Gazdikova
    Peter Kubatka
    Peter Urdzik
    Peter Kruzliak
    Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2020, 20 : 277 - 287
  • [25] Comparative study of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging and introvoxel incoherent motion in assessment of pathological grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
    Zhu, Qingqiang
    Zhu, Wenrong
    Wu, Jingtao
    Chen, Wenxin
    Ye, Jing
    Ling, Jun
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 95 (1133)
  • [26] The diagnostic role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in hypopharyngeal carcinoma
    Zhang, Si-Cong
    Zhou, Shui-Hong
    Shang, De-Sheng
    Bao, Yang-Yang
    Ruan, Ling-Xiang
    Wu, Ting-Ting
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 15 (04) : 5533 - 5544
  • [27] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics of Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma
    Wang, Wei
    Ding, Jianhui
    Zhu, Xiaoli
    Li, Yuan
    Gu, Yajia
    Peng, Weijun
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07):
  • [28] Utility of radiomics features of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma: model development and external validation
    Matsumoto, Shunya
    Arita, Yuki
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Fukushima, Hiroshi
    Kimura, Koichiro
    Yamada, Ichiro
    Tanaka, Hajime
    Yagi, Fumiko
    Yokoyama, Minato
    Matsuoka, Yoh
    Oya, Mototsugu
    Tateishi, Ukihide
    Jinzaki, Masahiro
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (06) : 2178 - 2186
  • [29] The incidence, pathogenesis, and management of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma
    Naik, Priyanka
    Dudipala, Harshitha
    Chen, Yu-Wei
    Rose, Brent
    Bagrodia, Aditya
    Mckay, Rana R.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2024, 16
  • [30] Predictive Value of Chemical-Shift MRI in Distinguishing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma
    Jhaveri, Kartik S.
    Elmi, Azadeh
    Hosseini-Nik, Hooman
    Hedgire, Sandeep
    Evans, Andrew
    Jewett, Michael
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (01) : W79 - W86