Quiet eye training during the rugby union goal-kick: Practice and transfer effects in low- and high-pressure conditions

被引:4
作者
Broodryk, Retief [1 ]
Moore, Lee J. [2 ]
Kruger, Ankebe [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] North West Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Phys Act Sport & Recreat Res Focus Area, Potchefstroom, South Africa
[2] Univ Bath, Dept Hlth, Bath, Avon, England
[3] North West Univ, Ctr Hlth & Human Performance CHHP, Potchefstroom, South Africa
关键词
Anxiety; attention; cognitive-perceptual expertise; gaze behaviour; motor control; vision; ATTENTIONAL CONTROL; IMPROVES ACCURACY; AIDS PERFORMANCE; VISUAL-ATTENTION; GAZE BEHAVIORS; ANXIETY; CHOKING;
D O I
10.1177/17479541221082631
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The present study aimed to examine the effect of a quiet eye training (QET) intervention compared to a technical training (TT) intervention on the visual control and performance of rugby union goal-kickers. Male rugby union players (n = 18, M-age = 21.35 years, SD = 2.03) were randomly assigned into a QET or TT group. Participants completed a pre-test, retention test 1, pressure test, and retention test 2 over six weeks, including a two-week intervention programme. The QET focussed on the QE and performance, while TT focussed on technical aspects of rugby goal-kicking. Each participant performed a total of 50 kicks that consisted of 15 kicks during the pre-test, retention test 1, and retention test 2, and five kicks during the pressure test. Using a Dikablis eye-tracker the QE was measured before (QE-pre), and during (QE-online), the run-up of the goal-kick. The results indicated that QE-pre durations increased from the pre-test to both retention tests and the pressure test for the QET group only (all p's < 0.05, all d's >= 0.08). The QET group also displayed longer QE-pre durations during the pressure and retention tests (all p's < 0.05, all d's >= 0.80), and longer QE-online durations during the pressure test (d = 0.73), compared to the TT group. Finally, the QET group outperformed the TT group during the pressure test (d = 0.72). Thus, overall, our results revealed that a short QET intervention benefitted attentional control and goal-kicking performance, particularly under high-pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 426
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] The importance of effect sizes
    Aarts, Sil
    van den Akker, Marjan
    Winkens, Bjorn
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2014, 20 (01) : 61 - 64
  • [2] Atack A., 2018, SPORT BIOMECH, V3141, P1
  • [3] A REVIEW OF PARADOXICAL PERFORMANCE EFFECTS - CHOKING UNDER PRESSURE IN SPORTS AND MENTAL TESTS
    BAUMEISTER, RF
    SHOWERS, CJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 16 (04) : 361 - 383
  • [4] State anxiety and visual attention: The role of the quiet eye period in aiming to a far target
    Behan, Michael
    Wilson, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2008, 26 (02) : 207 - 215
  • [5] Anxiety, Movement Kinematics, and Visual Attention in Elite-Level Performers
    Causer, Joe
    Holmes, Paul S.
    Smith, Nickolas C.
    Williams, A. Mark
    [J]. EMOTION, 2011, 11 (03) : 595 - 602
  • [6] An exploratory analysis of variations in quiet eye duration within and between levels of expertise
    Chia, Shannon Jingyi
    Chow, Jia Yi
    Kawabata, Masato
    Dicks, Matt
    Lee, Marcus
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT AND EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 15 (03) : 221 - 235
  • [7] Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, P75
  • [8] Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
    Corbetta, M
    Shulman, GL
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 3 (03) : 201 - 215
  • [9] Examination of gaze behaviors under in situ and video simulation task constraints reveals differences in information pickup for perception and action
    Dicks, Matt
    Button, Chris
    Davids, Keith
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2010, 72 (03) : 706 - 720
  • [10] Training Attentional Control Improves Cognitive and Motor Task Performance
    Ducrocq, Emmanuel
    Wilson, Mark
    Vine, Sam
    Derakshan, Nazanin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 38 (05) : 521 - 533