A critique of the policy discourse on primary health care under the Aardram mission of Kerala

被引:2
作者
Sreekumar, Sreenidhi [1 ]
Ravindran, T. K. Sundari [2 ]
机构
[1] Sree Chitra Tirunal Inst Med Sci & Technol, Achutha Menon Ctr Hlth Sci Studies, Thiruvananthapuram 695011, Kerala, India
[2] United Nations Univ, Int Inst Global Hlth, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
关键词
Aardram mission; family health centre; FHC initiative; comprehensive primary health care; primary health care; critical discourse analysis; decentralization; local self-government institutions; Kerala primary health care; NEOLIBERALISM; INEQUALITIES; DECLARATION;
D O I
10.1093/heapol/czad041
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In 2017, the State of Kerala in India, launched the 'Aardram' mission for health. One of the aims of the mission was to enhance the primary health care (PHC) provisioning in the state through the family health centre (FHC) initiative. This was envisaged through a comprehensive PHC approach that prioritized preventive, promotive, curative, rehabilitative and palliative services, and social determinants of health. Given this backdrop, the study aimed to examine the renewed policy commitment towards comprehensive PHC and the extent to which it remains true to the globally accepted ideals of PHC.This was undertaken using a critical discourse analysis (CDA) of the policy discourse on PHC. This included examining the policy documents related to FHC and Aardram as well as the narratives of policy-level actors on PHC and innovations for them. Through CDA we examined the discursive representation of PHC and innovations for improving it at the level of local governments in the state. Though the mission envisaged a shift from the influence of market-driven ideas of health, analysis of the current policy discourse on PHC suggested otherwise. The discourse continues to carry a curative care bias within its ideas of PHC. The disproportionate emphasis on strategies for early detection, treatment and infrastructural improvements meant limited space for preventive, protective and promotive dimensions, thus digressing from the gatekeeping role of PHC. The reduced emphasis on preventive and promotive dimensions and depoliticization of social determinants of health within the PHC discourse indicates that, in the long run, the mission puts at risk its stated goals of social justice and health equity envisioned in the FHC initiative.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 959
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
BEARD TC, 1979, LANCET, V1, P217
[2]  
Bhatia P, 2015, Medical Dialogues
[3]   Buzzwords and fuzzwords: deconstructing development discourse [J].
Cornwall, Andrea .
DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE, 2007, 17 (4-5) :471-484
[4]   The origins of primary health care and selective primary health care [J].
Cueto, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 94 (11) :1864-1874
[5]  
Dreyfus HL, 1982, On the genealogy of ethics: an overview of work in progress
[6]   Decentralization of health services: The Kerala People's Campaign [J].
Elamon, J ;
Franke, RW ;
Ekbal, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, 2004, 34 (04) :681-708
[7]  
Evans-Agnew Robin A, 2016, Policy Polit Nurs Pract, V17, P136
[8]  
Foucault M., 1977, Discipline and punish: The brith of the prison, V2nd
[9]  
Government of Kerala, 2021, Kerala development report: initiatives, achievements, and challenges
[10]  
Government of Kerala, 2017, NavaKeralam Karmapadhai