Dynamic Contrast-enhanced CT Lymphangiography to Quantify Thoracic Duct Lymphatic Flow

被引:1
作者
Molloi, Sabee [1 ]
Polivka, Alesh R. [1 ]
Zhao, Yixiao [1 ]
Redmond, Jonas [3 ]
Itkin, Maxim [4 ]
Antunes, Ines [1 ]
Yu, Zhaoxia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Radiol Sci, Med Sci 1,B-140, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Stat, Med Sci 1,B-140, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiol Sci, San Diego, CA USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
MR LYMPHANGIOGRAPHY; VENOUS-PRESSURE; GADOFOSVESET; DIAGNOSIS; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.230959
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: CT lymphangiography has been used to image the lymphatic anatomy and assess lymphatic abnormalities. There is, however, a need to develop a method for quantification of lymphatic flow rate in the thoracic duct (TD). Purpose: To develop and validate a TD lymphatic flow measurement technique using dynamic contrast -enhanced CT lymphangiography. Materials and Methods: Lymphatic flow rate was measured with two techniques: a first -pass analysis technique based on a single compartment model and a thresholding technique distinguishing between opacified and nonopacified voxels within the TD. The measurements were validated in a swine animal model between November 2021 and September 2022. CT images were acquired at 100 kV and 200 mA using a fast -pitched helical scan mode covering the entire TD following contrast material injection into the bilateral inguinal lymph nodes. Two helical CT scans, acquired at the base and peak contrast enhancement of the TD, were used to measure lymphatic flow rate. A US flow probe surgically placed around the TD provided the reference standard measurement. CT lymphatic flow measurements were compared with the reference US flow probe measurements using regression and Bland -Altman analysis. Repeatability was determined using repeated flow measurements within approximately 10 minutes of each other. Results: Eleven swine (10 male; mean weight, 43.6 kg +/- 2.6 [SD]) were evaluated with 71 dynamic CT acquisitions. The lymphatic flow rates measured using the first -pass analysis and thresholding techniques were highly correlated with the reference US flow probe measurements (r = 0.99 and 0.91, respectively) and showed good agreement with the reference standard, with Bland -Altman analysis showing small mean differences of 0.04 and 0.05 mL/min, respectively. The first -pass analysis and thresholding techniques also showed good agreement for repeated flow measurements (r = 0.94 and 0.90, respectively), with small mean differences of 0.09 and 0.03 mL/min, respectively. Conclusion: The first -pass analysis and thresholding techniques could be used to accurately and noninvasively quantify TD lymphatic flow using dynamic contrast -enhanced CT lymphangiography.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessing Microcirculation in Resectable Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI for Identifying Primary tumour and Lymphatic Metastasis
    Chen, Yan-li
    Jiang, Yu
    Chen, Tian-wu
    Li, Rui
    Zhang, Xiao-ming
    Chen, Fan
    Wu, Lan
    Ou, Jing
    Yang, Jian-qiong
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [32] Synovial sarcoma: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging features
    van Rijswijk, CSP
    Hogendoorn, PCW
    Taminiau, AHM
    Bloem, JL
    [J]. SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 30 (01) : 25 - 30
  • [33] Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Perfusion Quantification With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Taouli, Bachir
    Johnson, R. Scott
    Hajdu, Cristina H.
    Oei, Marcel T. H.
    Merad, Miriam
    Yee, Herman
    Rusinek, Henry
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (04) : 795 - 800
  • [34] Hepatic Perfusion Disorder Associated with Focal Liver Lesions: Contrast-enhanced US Patterns-Correlation Study with Contrast-enhanced CT
    Zhou, Xiang
    Luo, Yan
    Peng, Yu-Lan
    Cai, Wei
    Lu, Qiang
    Lin, Ling
    Sha, Xiao-Xi
    Li, Yong-Zhong
    Zhu, Meng
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2011, 260 (01) : 274 - 281
  • [35] Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography: Categorization of imaging findings and correlation with patient management
    Pimpalwar, Sheena
    Chinnadurai, Ponraj
    Chau, Alex
    Pereyra, Mercedes
    Ashton, Daniel
    Masand, Prakash
    Krishnamurthy, Rajesh
    Jadhav, Siddharth
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 101 : 129 - 135
  • [36] Staging accuracy of pancreatic cancer: Comparison between non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced PET/CT
    Yoneyama, Tomohiro
    Tateishi, Ukihide
    Endo, Itaru
    Inoue, Tomio
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (10) : 1734 - 1739
  • [37] Cross-modality PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT imaging for pancreatic cancer
    Zhang, Jian
    Zuo, Chang-Jing
    Jia, Ning-Yang
    Wang, Jian-Hua
    Hu, Sheng-Ping
    Yu, Zhong-Fei
    Zheng, Yuan
    Zhang, An-Yu
    Feng, Xiao-Yuan
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (10) : 2988 - 2996
  • [38] Deep Learning with Convolutional Neural Network for Differentiation of Liver Masses at Dynamic Contrast-enhanced CT: A Preliminary Study
    Yasaka, Koichiro
    Akai, Hiroyuki
    Abe, Osamu
    Kiryu, Shigeru
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 286 (03) : 899 - 908
  • [39] Prediction of T stage in gastric carcinoma by enhanced CT and oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
    Yu, Tao
    Wang, Xinling
    Zhao, Zilong
    Liu, Fan
    Liu, Xiaoting
    Zhao, Yan
    Luo, Yahong
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 13
  • [40] Contrast-Enhanced CT for Localizing Compressive Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Extrusion
    Schroeder, Regina
    Pelsue, Davyd H.
    Park, Richard D.
    Gasso, Daniel
    Bruecker, Kenneth A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ANIMAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 47 (03) : 203 - 209