Abortion stigma among abortion seekers, healthcare professionals and the public in high-income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review protocol

被引:1
作者
Bernard, Marie [1 ]
Niemann, Jana [1 ]
Weinhold, Laura [1 ]
Jepsen, Dennis [1 ]
Miani, Celine [2 ]
Luck-Sikorski, Claudia [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Med Sociol, Halle, Germany
[2] Bielefeld Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Social Epidemiol & Int Publ Hlth, Bielefeld, Germany
[3] SRH Hsch Gesundheit GmbH, Gera, Germany
[4] Univ Leipzig, Integrated Res & Treatment Ctr IFB Adipos Dis, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Systematic Review; Stereotyping; SEXUAL MEDICINE; REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE; METHODOLOGICAL GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076602
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Abortion is a crucial sexual and reproductive right. However, the legal situation of pregnancy termination is rather heterogeneous across countries and regions. The political climate and cultural perception may result in abortion-related stigma. This mixed-methods systematic review protocol aims to detail the proposed methods for assessing the current state of research on abortion stigma in high-income countries from an abortion seeker, healthcare provider and public perspective.Methods and analysis Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols guideline, we conducted a systematic literature search of peer-reviewed studies from high-income countries in relevant electronic databases: PubMed, CINHAL, PsycINFO, LIVIVO and Cochrane Library. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method studies that measured or examined abortion-related stigma in abortion seekers, healthcare professionals and the general public will be included. Assessment of risk of bias, data synthesis and qualitative meta-aggregation will be carried out.Ethics and dissemination The results of the systematic review will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2023, World Bank: country and lending groups
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Abortion care guideline
[3]   Standing on the Shoulders of Goffman: Advancing a Relational Research Agenda on Stigma [J].
Aranda, Ana M. ;
Helms, Wesley S. ;
Patterson, Karen D. W. ;
Roulet, Thomas J. ;
Hudson, Bryant Ashley .
BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2023, 62 (07) :1339-1377
[4]   Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990-2019 [J].
Bearak, Jonathan ;
Popinchalk, Anna ;
Ganatra, Bela ;
Moller, Ann-Beth ;
Tuncalp, Ozge ;
Beavin, Cynthia ;
Kwok, Lorraine ;
Alkema, Leontine .
LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 8 (09) :E1152-E1161
[5]   Enacted stigma and felt stigma experienced by adults who stutter [J].
Boyle, Michael P. .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2018, 73 :50-61
[6]   Abortion in Europe: Recent legislative changes and risk of inequality [J].
Cioffi, Andrea ;
Cecannecchia, Camilla ;
Cioffi, Fernanda ;
Bolino, Giorgio ;
Rinaldi, Raffaella .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE, 2022, 33 (03) :281-286
[7]   "I'm Not That Type of Person": Managing the Stigma of Having an Abortion [J].
Cockrill, Kate ;
Nack, Adina .
DEVIANT BEHAVIOR, 2013, 34 (12) :973-990
[8]   The Stigma of Having an Abortion: Development of a Scale and Characteristics of Women Experiencing Abortion Stigma [J].
Cockrill, Kate ;
Upadhyay, Ushma D. ;
Turan, Janet ;
Foster, Diana Greene .
PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2013, 45 (02) :79-88
[9]   Enacted abortion stigma in the United States [J].
Cowan, Sarah K. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 177 :259-268
[10]  
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, 2023, CASP checklist: 10 questions to help you make sense of a qualitative research