An Essay about a Philosophical Attitude in Management and Organization Studies Based on Parrhesia

被引:3
作者
Rodriguez-Pomeda, Jesus [1 ]
机构
[1] Autonomous Univ Madrid, Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Econ & Business, Dept Business Org, Room E-8-310, 5 Francisco Tomas & Valiente St, Madrid 28049, Spain
关键词
Management; Organization studies; Philosophy; Dialogue; Attitude; Parrhesia; SCIENCE; RELEVANCE; FOUCAULT; SPECIFICITY; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; SCHOLARS; PROGRESS; DEBATE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s40926-023-00232-9
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Management and organization studies (MOS) scholarship is at a crossroads. The grand challenges (such as the climate emergency) humankind must face today require an improved contribution from all knowledge fields. The number of academics who criticize the lack of influence and social impact of MOS has recently grown. The scientific field structure of MOS is based on its members' accumulation of symbolic capital. This structure hinders speaking truth to the elite dominating neoliberal society. Our literature review suggested that a deeper interaction between MOS and philosophy could aid in improving the social impact of MOS. Specifically, an attitude by MOS scholars based on parrhesia (pi alpha rho rho eta sigma i alpha, to speak truth to power) could revitalize the field through heterodox approaches and, consequently, allow them to utter sound criticisms of the capitalist system. Parrhesia would lead MOS scholars towards a convergence of ethics and politics. We investigate whether daring to speak inconvenient truths to the powerful (some peers in the field and some individuals and corporations in society) can be a straightforward tool for revitalizing MOS. Boosting a candid philosophy-MOS interaction requires the fulfilment of three objectives: practical dialogue between these fields, reconsideration of the fields' structures based on symbolic capital, and a post-disciplinary approach to philosophy. That fulfilment implies the delimitation of the MOS-philosophy interaction, a respectful mutual framework, mutual curiosity, and moving from prescriptive theoretical reflection towards more socially useful MOS. Ethical betterment through parrhesia could be the key to surpassing MOS stagnation.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 618
页数:32
相关论文
共 152 条
  • [51] Gabriel Markus., 2013, Speculations, V4, P74
  • [52] Gadamer Hans-Georg., 2006, Truth and Method
  • [53] Gare A., 2022, HDB PHILOS MANAGEMEN, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8]
  • [54] UNDERSTANDING AND TACKLING SOCIETAL GRAND CHALLENGES THROUGH MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
    George, Gerard
    Howard-Grenville, Jennifer
    Joshi, Aparna
    Tihanyi, Laszlo
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 59 (06) : 1880 - 1895
  • [55] Gergen K.J., 1995, Social construction and the educational process: Constructivism in education
  • [56] GIBBONS M., 1997, The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies
  • [57] Gilbert Margaret., 1989, SOCIAL FACTS
  • [58] Non-domination, contestation and freedom: The contribution of Philip Pettit to learning and democracy in organisations
    Griffin, Martyn
    Learmonth, Mark
    Elliott, Carole
    [J]. MANAGEMENT LEARNING, 2015, 46 (03) : 317 - 336
  • [59] Griseri P., 2013, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Management
  • [60] Gros F., 2015, OEUVRES, VI, pI