The Surface Free Energy of Resin-Based Composite in Context of Wetting Ability of Dental Adhesives

被引:3
作者
Szaloki, Melinda [1 ]
Szabo, Zsofia [2 ]
Martos, Renata [2 ]
Csik, Attila [3 ]
Szollosi, Gergo Jozsef [4 ]
Hegedus, Csaba [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Debrecen, Fac Dent, Dept Biomat & Prosthet Dent, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
[2] Univ Debrecen, Fac Dent, Dept Operat Dent & Endodont, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
[3] HUN REN Inst Nucl Res ATOMK, H-4026 Debrecen, Hungary
[4] Univ Debrecen, Fac Econ & Business, Coordinat Ctr Res Social Sci, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 21期
关键词
resin-based composite; contact angle; dental adhesive; surface free energy; surface roughness; POLISHING SYSTEMS; ROUGHNESS; STRENGTH; REPAIR; BOND;
D O I
10.3390/app132112061
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The surface roughness, surface free energy (SFE) of composites, and composite wettability by dental adhesives are determining factors in achieving a strong and durable adhesion (e.g., composite repair, luting adhesively bonded indirect restorations). In this study, the SFE of one nanohydrid and two bulk-fill composites was investigated in relation to the wetting ability of five different dental adhesives. The profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurement justified that the sandblasting produced a significantly rough surface in which the different filler amounts, filler distribution, and resin-filler ratio participated. The SFE of the tested composite was between 45.65 and 49.07 mJ/m2 regardless of surface treatment. Despite the similarity in SFE, the adhesives wet the surface of the composites in different ways that were between 16.01 degrees and 35.10 degrees. The contact angle of solvent-free dental adhesive was lower due to sandblasting supporting the micromechanical retention. Based on our results, it was found that sandblasting, the most frequently recommended surface treatment, does not change the surface energy but causes a change in the contact angle, which can be explained by the different surface tension of the dental adhesives. It was concluded that the dental adhesive parameters have a more important role in wettability.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [2] Resin composites: Strength of the bond to dentin versus surface energy parameters
    Asmussen, E
    Peutzfeldt, A
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS, 2005, 21 (11) : 1039 - 1043
  • [3] Aytac F, 2016, J ESTHET RESTOR DENT, V28, P247, DOI 10.1111/jerd.12215
  • [4] Effects of different surface treatments and adhesive self-etch functional monomers on the repair of bulk fill composites: A randomised controlled study
    Blum, Igor R.
    Martos, Renata
    Szaloki, Melinda
    Lynch, Christopher D.
    Hegedus, Csaba
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2021, 108
  • [5] 10-MDP Based Dental Adhesives: Adhesive Interface Characterization and Adhesive StabilityA Systematic Review
    Carrilho, Eunice
    Cardoso, Miguel
    Ferreira, Manuel Marques
    Marto, Carlos Miguel
    Paula, Anabela
    Coelho, Ana Sofia
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (05)
  • [6] de Souza MO, 2017, BRAZ ORAL RES, V31, DOI [10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0004, 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0004]
  • [7] Surface energy of hydroxyapatite and ß-tricalcium phosphate ceramics driving serum protein adsorption and osteoblast adhesion
    dos Santos, E. A.
    Farina, M.
    Soares, G. A.
    Anselme, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 19 (06) : 2307 - 2316
  • [8] Erdman N., 2019, Springer Handbook of Microscopy, P229, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-00069-15, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-00069-1_5]
  • [9] Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments
    Ferreira da Costa, Thays Regina
    Serrano, Alexandra Mena
    Faria Atman, Allbens Picardi
    Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado
    Reis, Alessandra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2012, 40 (06) : 513 - 521
  • [10] Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill composites
    Furness, Alan
    Tadros, Marko Yousef
    Looney, Stephen W.
    Rueggeberg, Frederick A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2014, 42 (04) : 439 - 449