Institutions threshold effect in the corporate social responsibility-corporate performance relationship: a PSTR approach

被引:0
|
作者
Ghardallou, Wafa [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman Univ, Coll Business Adm, Dept Accounting, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman Univ, Coll Business Adm, Dept Accounting, POB 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Firm performance; corporate social responsibility; formal institutions; informal institutions; developing countries; panel smooth regression model; FORMAL INSTITUTIONS; CSR; MAXIMIZATION; REGULATIONS; GOVERNANCE; LEGITIMACY; DISCLOSURE; FRAMEWORK; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1080/14783363.2023.2210065
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The present study investigates whether the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and business performance varies with the quality of formal and informal institutions. It particularly examines the non linearity of this relationship by considering the institutional quality as a threshold variable. The composite index measuring the regulatory efficiency quality is used to measure formal institutions, whereas indexes of self-enhancement and Self-transcendence are used to proxy the quality of informal values. Relying on a Panel Smooth Threshold Regression for 402 firms in 24 emerging countries over the period 2015-2021, findings indicate a non-linear link between CSR and firm performance. Particularly, there is a regulatory quality and Self-transcendence levels thresholds, beyond them CSR increases the corporate profitability whereas CSR impedes firm performance for higher levels of self-enhancement values. Managers can better identify where strategic priorities exist by analyzing whether these informal or formal institutions are evident in businesses' actions connected to social responsibility.
引用
收藏
页码:1292 / 1314
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Relationship of Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: A Bibliometric Overview
    Sharma, Deepa
    Chakraborty, Suman
    Rao, Ashwath Ananda
    Lobo, Lumen Shawn
    SAGE OPEN, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [42] The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in Hainan
    Wu, Meiyun
    2015 4th International Conference on Social Sciences and Society (ICSSS 2015), Pt 3, 2015, 72 : 372 - 375
  • [43] Exploring the role of board-level corporate social responsibility committees in corporate social responsibility performance: A configurational approach
    Bolourian, Soudabeh
    Alinaghian, Leila
    Angus, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023, 169
  • [44] Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance of RIL
    Ransariya, Shailesh N.
    Bhayani, Sanjay J.
    PACIFIC BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 7 (11): : 66 - 75
  • [45] The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Performance on Financial Risk
    Hsiao, Li-Peng
    Chen, Weitzu
    Lin, Jwu-Rong
    NTU MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 30 (02): : 257 - 310
  • [46] Relationship of Ethical Leadership, Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Performance
    Kim, Min-Seong
    Thapa, Brijesh
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (02)
  • [47] Impact of Corporate Political Activity on the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach
    Lin, Woon Leong
    Ho, Jo Ann
    Sambasivan, Murali
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (01):
  • [48] A Fusion Approach for Exploring the Key Factors of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility Performance
    Hu, Kuang-Hua
    Lin, Sin-Jin
    Hsu, Ming-Fu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (05)
  • [49] Managing corporate performance Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in emerging markets
    Aras, Guler
    Aybars, Asli
    Kutlu, Ozlem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 59 (03) : 229 - 254
  • [50] The Causal Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility
    Hoje Jo
    Maretno A. Harjoto
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2012, 106 : 53 - 72