The digital harms of smart home devices: A systematic literature review

被引:25
作者
Buil-Gil, David [1 ,8 ]
Kemp, Steven [2 ]
Kuenzel, Stefanie [3 ]
Coventry, Lynne [4 ]
Zakhary, Sameh [5 ]
Tilley, Daniel [6 ]
Nicholson, James [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Dept Criminol, Manchester, England
[2] Univ Girona, Dept Publ Law, Girona, Spain
[3] Royal Holloway Univ London, Dept Elect Engn, London, England
[4] Abertay Univ, Div Cybersecur, Dundee, Scotland
[5] Zakhary IT Serv Ltd, London, England
[6] Daniel Tilley Analyt Solut Ltd, London, England
[7] Northumbria Univ, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, London, England
[8] Univ Manchester, Dept Criminol, 4-44 Williamson Bldg, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Internet of things; Cybercrime; Hacking; Privacy; Smart readers; Security; INTERNET; THINGS; SUPPORT; ATTACKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2023.107770
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The connection of home electronic devices to the internet allows remote control of physical devices and involves the collection of large volumes of data. With the increase in the uptake of Internet-of-Things home devices, it becomes critical to understand the digital harms of smart homes. We present a systematic literature review on the security and privacy harms of smart homes. PRISMA methodology is used to systematically review 63 studies published between January 2011 and October 2021; and a review of known cases is undertaken to illustrate the literature review findings with real-world scenarios. Published literature identifies that smart homes may pose threats to confidentiality (unwanted release of information), authentication (sensing information being falsified) and unauthorised access to system controls. Most existing studies focus on privacy intrusions as a prevalent form of harm against smart homes. Other types of harms that are less common in the literature include hacking, malware and DoS attacks. Digital harms, and data associated with these harms, may vary extensively across smart devices. Most studies propose technical measures to mitigate digital harms, while fewer consider social prevention mechanisms. We also identify salient gaps in research, and argue that these should be addressed in future crossdisciplinary research initiatives.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 102 条
  • [1] Aafer Y, 2021, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 30TH USENIX SECURITY SYMPOSIUM, P2759
  • [2] A taxonomy of cyber-harms: Defining the impacts of cyber-attacks and understanding how they propagate
    Agrafiotis, Ioannis
    Nurse, Jason R. C.
    Goldsmith, Michael
    Creese, Sadie
    Upton, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CYBERSECURITY, 2018, 4 (01):
  • [3] Ali W., 2017, 2017 23 INT C AUT CO, P1, DOI DOI 10.23919/ICONAC.2017.8082057
  • [4] Alkhatib Sami, 2019, Stud Health Technol Inform, V266, P7, DOI 10.3233/SHTI190765
  • [5] AlOtaibi N., 2021, INT C WOM DAT SCI TA, V2021, P1
  • [6] Towards a Unified Trust Framework for Detecting IoT Device Attacks in Smart Homes
    Alsheakh, Hussein
    Bhattacharjee, Shameek
    [J]. 2020 IEEE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE AD HOC AND SMART SYSTEMS (MASS 2020), 2020, : 613 - 621
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2021, The Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure (PSTI) Bill-Product security Factsheet
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2019, CBC News
  • [9] Hardening machine learning denial of service (DoS) defences against adversarial attacks in IoT smart home networks
    Anthi, Eirini
    Williams, Lowri
    Laved, Amir
    Burnap, Pete
    [J]. COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2021, 108
  • [10] EclipseloT: A secure and adaptive hub for the Internet of Things
    Anthi, Eirini
    Ahmad, Shazaib
    Rana, Omer
    Theodorakopoulos, George
    Burnap, Pete
    [J]. COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2018, 78 : 477 - 490