Engineering design learning for high school and college first-year students in a STEM battlebot design project

被引:10
作者
Chien, Yu-Hung [1 ]
Liu, Chia-Yu [2 ]
Chan, Shaio-Chung [3 ]
Chang, Yu-Shan [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Dept Technol Applicat & Human Resource Dev, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Acad Educ Res, Res Ctr Testing & Assessment, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Ming Chuan Univ, Dept Prod Design, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
Creativity; Engineering design; Lag sequential analysis; Reflective practice; AUGMENTED REALITY; COMPARING FRESHMAN; THINKING; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1186/s40594-023-00403-0
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundThere is a worldwide trend to include engineering design in high school curricula as a bridge course to higher-level STEM education and to increase high school students' interest in STEM fields. This study used a battlebot design curriculum to compare engineering design learning between high school and college first-year students and then proposed suggestions for curriculum planning that promoted the continuity of learning between different levels of engineering design education.ResultsThis study used the creative product analysis matrix (CPAM) and lag sequential analysis (LSA) to explore the possible similarities and differences between the two groups' understanding of engineering design. The results show that college first-year students were significantly better than high school students in CPAM, but the two groups were similar in their reflections on engineering design behaviors, indicating that the noncumulative learning results must be taken seriously.ConclusionsHigher-order engineering design thinking skills take a longer time to develop than technical skills. For both high school and college first-year students, it is important to enhance their higher-order engineering design thinking skills to promote higher engineering design performance. Moreover, high school students could be provided with convenient processing tools and easy-to-use, hands-on techniques to increase their technical skills. Educators from institutions of higher education and K-12 schools should work together to develop pedagogical models that provide rigorous, well-rounded education and outstanding engineering design instructions to most effectively cultivate STEM talent.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Alemdar M, 2017, INT J ENG EDUC, V33, P441
[2]  
Atman C J, 2000, Am. Soc. Eng. Educ, P1, DOI [10.18260/1-2--8204, DOI 10.18260/1-2--8204]
[3]  
Atman C.J., 1998, Journal of Engineering Education, V87, P121, DOI [DOI 10.1002/J.2168-9830.1998.TB00332.X, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00332.x]
[4]  
Atman C.J., 1999, Design Studies, V20, P131, DOI [10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00031-3, DOI 10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00031-3, DOI 10.1016/S0142-694X]
[5]   Comparing freshman and senior engineering design processes: an in-depth follow-up study [J].
Atman, CJ ;
Cardella, ME ;
Turns, J ;
Adams, R .
DESIGN STUDIES, 2005, 26 (04) :325-357
[6]   Teaching engineering design: Can reading a textbook make a difference? [J].
Atman, CJ ;
Bursic, KM .
RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND CONCURRENT ENGINEERING, 1996, 8 (04) :240-250
[7]   Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners [J].
Atman, Cynthia J. ;
Adams, Robin S. ;
Cardella, Monica E. ;
Turns, Jennifer ;
Mosborg, Susan ;
Saleem, Jason .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2007, 96 (04) :359-379
[8]   Design timelines: Concrete and sticky representations of design process expertise [J].
Atman, Cynthia J. .
DESIGN STUDIES, 2019, 65 :125-151
[9]  
Bakeman R., 2011, SEQUENTIAL ANAL OBSE, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139017343
[10]  
Bakeman R., 1986, OBSERVING INTERACTIO, VSecond