Patient Empowerment in Cancer Care: A Scoping Review

被引:7
作者
Kim, Soo Hyun [1 ,2 ]
Choe, Yu Hyeon [1 ]
Kim, Da Hye [1 ]
机构
[1] Inha Univ, Dept Nursing, Incheon, South Korea
[2] Inha Univ, Dept Nursing, 100 Inha Ro, Incheon 22212, South Korea
关键词
Empowerment; Literature review; Neoplasms; Oncology nursing; GROUP MEDICAL CONSULTATIONS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BREAST-CANCER; SELF-MANAGEMENT; FOLLOW-UP; PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT; EDUCATION; IMPACT; SURVIVORS; LITERACY;
D O I
10.1097/NCC.0000000000001228
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Patient empowerment is receiving increasing attention in cancer care, and its relevance has led to a growing body of literature. Empowerment-related evidence, however, has not been comprehensively reviewed. Objective: The purpose of this scoping review was to summarize the available evidence on patient empowerment in cancer care. Specifically, we examined how patient empowerment has been defined and measured and what we have learned. Methods: We searched 6 databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO), adapting key search terms (eg, "neoplasm," "empowerment") to each. Extracted data included author, publication year, country of data collection, main study purpose, study design, sampling method, setting, cancer trajectory, definition of empowerment and its source, measurement of empowerment, correlates, intervention (if applicable), and major results. Results: Of the 2987 articles we initially identified, we included 64 studies (18 quantitative, 9 qualitative, 9 psychometric validation, 8 mixed methods, 6 reviews, and 14 others). Across designs, randomized controlled trials were the most frequent. A comprehensive summary by study designs was provided. Conclusions: The review highlights the importance of defining the empowerment concept, which is generally vague. There is a paucity of research on examining the relationship between empowerment and its related concepts. More nonexperimental studies (eg, cross-sectional, longitudinal, case-control studies) are required. Implications for practice: Nurses are in an optimal position to engage in the process of empowerment, leading to its benefits. To achieve the best outcomes, nurses need to clarify the definition, select an appropriate measurement, and be trained in empowerment strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 483
页数:13
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
American Cancer Society, Cancer treatment & survivorship facts & figures 2019-2021
[2]  
Anderson Robert M, 2009, Ther Patient Educ, V1, P3
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, LANCET, V379, P1677, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60699-0
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, WHO GUIDELINES HAND
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Health 2020, A European policy framework and strategy for the 21st century
[6]  
Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [10.1080/1364557032000119616, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
[7]   Patient empowerment in theory and practice: Polysemy or cacophony? [J].
Aujoulat, Isabelle ;
d'Hoore, William ;
Deccache, Alain .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2007, 66 (01) :13-20
[8]   The patient perspective: investigating patient empowerment enablers and barriers within the oncological care process [J].
Bailo, Luca ;
Guiddi, Paolo ;
Vergani, Laura ;
Marton, Giulia ;
Pravettoni, Gabriella .
ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2019, 13
[9]   Educational preferences, psychological well-being and self-efficacy among people with rheumatoid arthritis [J].
Barlow, JH ;
Cullen, LA ;
Rowe, IF .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2002, 46 (01) :11-19
[10]   Fertility knowledge and associated empowerment following an educational intervention for adolescent cancer patients [J].
Borgmann-Staudt, Anja ;
Kunstreich, Marina ;
Schilling, Ralph ;
Balcerek, Magdalena ;
Dirksen, Uta ;
Cario, Holger ;
Kepakova, Katerina ;
Klco-Brosius, Stephanie ;
Korte, Elisabeth ;
Kruseova, Jarmila ;
Lackner, Herwig ;
Langer, Thorsten ;
Roslan, Katarzyna-Muszynska ;
Stefanowicz, Joanna ;
Strauss, Gabriele ;
Byrne, Julianne .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 28 (11) :2218-2225