Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Patients With Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation With Optic Capture in Berger Space for Pediatric Cataract

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Menghan [1 ,2 ]
Li, Dongfang [2 ,3 ]
Fan, Zheng [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jing [2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Jinyan [2 ,3 ]
Huang, Yusen [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Coll Med, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong First Med Univ, State Key Lab Cultivat Base, Shandong Prov Key Lab Ophthalmol, Eye Inst, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong First Med Univ, Qingdao Eye Hosp, Qingdao, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PREDICTION FORMULAS; MYOPIC SHIFT; AXIAL LENGTH; VISUAL AXIS; SURGERY; ERROR; CAPSULORHEXIS; OPACIFICATION; PSEUDOPHAKIA; BIOMETRY;
D O I
10.3928/01913913-20220428-01
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas in pediatric patients with multifocal IOL implantation with optic capture in Berger space. Methods:This prospective observational study enrolled 68 children (101 eyes), aged 3 to 14 years, who received multifocal IOL (Tecnis ZMB00; Abbott Medical Optics) implantation with optic capture in Berger space from June 2019 to June 2020 in Qingdao Eye Hospital. Ocular biometry was performed using the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec). The IOL power and intended postoperative refraction were calculated using the Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Holladay, Holladay2, SRK/T, Haigis, and SRKII formulas. The refractive state of patients, prediction error, and absolute prediction error were evaluated. Results: The mean absolute error of the formulas was significantly different (0.49 diopters [D], Hoffer Q; 0.52 D, Barrett Universal II; 0.47 D, Holladay; 0.54 D, Holladay2; 0.52 D, SRK/T; 0.67 D, Haigis; 0.99 D, SRKII; P < .001). However, the Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Holladay, Holladay2, and SRK/T formulas had a similar accuracy in predicting refractive error within +/- 0.50 D (62.4%, 59.4%, 62.4%, 62.4%, and 58.4%). There was a trend toward a greater prediction error in eyes with a shorter axial length (<= 22 mm) or a steeper cornea (> 43.50 D), for which the Hoffer Q and Holladay2 formulas were more accurate. When the axial length was greater than 22 mm or the corneal curvature was 43.50 D or less, the Holladay, Hoffer Q, and Barrett Universal II formulas were more accurate. Conclusions: For patients with pediatric cataract treated with multifocal IOL implantation with optic capture in Berger space, the Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Holladay, Holladay2, and SRK/T formulas performed better than the other formulas.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Advancements in intraocular lens power calculation formulas
    Chung, Jinkwon
    Bu, Jennifer J.
    Afshari, Natalie A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 33 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [42] Comparison of 9 modern intraocular lens power calculation formulas for a quadrifocal intraocular lens
    Shajari, Mehdi
    Kolb, Carolin M.
    Petermann, Kerstin
    Boehm, Myriam
    Herzog, Michael
    de'Lorenzo, Nina
    Schoenbrunn, Sabrina
    Kohnen, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 44 (08): : 942 - 948
  • [43] Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Highly Myopic Eyes
    Zhang, Yichi
    Liang, Xiao Ying
    Liu, Shu
    Lee, Jacky W. Y.
    Bhaskar, Srinivasan
    Lam, Dennis S. C.
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 2016
  • [44] Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas for highly myopic eyes
    Zhang, Yichi
    Liang, Xiao Ying
    Liu, Shu
    Lee, Jacky W. Y.
    Bhaskar, Srinivasan
    Lam, Dennis S. C.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2016, 57 (12)
  • [45] Postoperative outcomes of intraocular lens implantation in the bag versus posterior optic capture in pediatric cataract surgery
    Vasavada, Abhay R.
    Vasavada, Vaishali
    Shah, Sajani K.
    Trivedi, Rupal H.
    Vasavada, Viraj A.
    Vasavada, Shail A.
    Srivastava, Samaresh
    Sudhalkar, Aditya
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 43 (09): : 1177 - 1183
  • [46] Diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation in patients with monofocal intraocular lens in the contralateral eye
    Jae Yong Kim
    Yunhan Lee
    Hun Jae Won
    Hyerin Jeong
    Jin Hyoung Park
    Myoung Joon Kim
    Hungwon Tchah
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, (05) : 737 - 743
  • [47] Diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation in patients with monofocal intraocular lens in the contralateral eye
    Kim, Jae Yong
    Lee, Yunhan
    Won, Hun Jae
    Jeong, Hyerin
    Park, Jin Hyoung
    Kim, Myoung Joon
    Tchah, Hungwon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 13 (05) : 737 - 743
  • [49] Intraocular lens optic capture in eyes with zonular weakness in cataract patients
    Devranoglu, Kazim
    Kilic, Aylin
    Ozdamar, Akff
    Yurtsever, Ali Kerem
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 39 (05): : 669 - 672
  • [50] Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Formulas Modified for Patients with Keratoconus
    Kane, Jack X.
    Connell, Benjamin
    Yip, Harry
    McAlister, James C.
    Beckingsale, Peter
    Snibson, Grant R.
    Chan, Elsie
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 127 (08) : 1037 - 1042