Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Patients With Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation With Optic Capture in Berger Space for Pediatric Cataract

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Menghan [1 ,2 ]
Li, Dongfang [2 ,3 ]
Fan, Zheng [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jing [2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Jinyan [2 ,3 ]
Huang, Yusen [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Coll Med, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong First Med Univ, State Key Lab Cultivat Base, Shandong Prov Key Lab Ophthalmol, Eye Inst, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong First Med Univ, Qingdao Eye Hosp, Qingdao, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PREDICTION FORMULAS; MYOPIC SHIFT; AXIAL LENGTH; VISUAL AXIS; SURGERY; ERROR; CAPSULORHEXIS; OPACIFICATION; PSEUDOPHAKIA; BIOMETRY;
D O I
10.3928/01913913-20220428-01
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas in pediatric patients with multifocal IOL implantation with optic capture in Berger space. Methods:This prospective observational study enrolled 68 children (101 eyes), aged 3 to 14 years, who received multifocal IOL (Tecnis ZMB00; Abbott Medical Optics) implantation with optic capture in Berger space from June 2019 to June 2020 in Qingdao Eye Hospital. Ocular biometry was performed using the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec). The IOL power and intended postoperative refraction were calculated using the Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Holladay, Holladay2, SRK/T, Haigis, and SRKII formulas. The refractive state of patients, prediction error, and absolute prediction error were evaluated. Results: The mean absolute error of the formulas was significantly different (0.49 diopters [D], Hoffer Q; 0.52 D, Barrett Universal II; 0.47 D, Holladay; 0.54 D, Holladay2; 0.52 D, SRK/T; 0.67 D, Haigis; 0.99 D, SRKII; P < .001). However, the Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Holladay, Holladay2, and SRK/T formulas had a similar accuracy in predicting refractive error within +/- 0.50 D (62.4%, 59.4%, 62.4%, 62.4%, and 58.4%). There was a trend toward a greater prediction error in eyes with a shorter axial length (<= 22 mm) or a steeper cornea (> 43.50 D), for which the Hoffer Q and Holladay2 formulas were more accurate. When the axial length was greater than 22 mm or the corneal curvature was 43.50 D or less, the Holladay, Hoffer Q, and Barrett Universal II formulas were more accurate. Conclusions: For patients with pediatric cataract treated with multifocal IOL implantation with optic capture in Berger space, the Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Holladay, Holladay2, and SRK/T formulas performed better than the other formulas.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Meta-analysis of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in short eyes
    Wang, Qiwei
    Jiang, Wu
    Lin, Tiao
    Wu, Xiaohang
    Lin, Haotian
    Chen, Weirong
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 46 (04) : 356 - 363
  • [22] Accuracy of 14 intraocular lens power calculation formulas in extremely long eyes
    Li, Xinxin
    Song, Chunyuan
    Wang, Yong
    Wang, Jing
    Tang, Qiongyan
    Wu, Zheming
    Zhou, Yanwen
    Sun, Juan
    Jia, Yanhong
    Lin, Zhenlin
    Li, Shaowei
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 262 (11) : 3619 - 3628
  • [23] Comparison of 9 modern intraocular lens power calculation formulas for a quadrifocal intraocular lens
    Shajari, Mehdi
    Kolb, Carolin M.
    Petermann, Kerstin
    Boehm, Myriam
    Herzog, Michael
    de'Lorenzo, Nina
    Schoenbrunn, Sabrina
    Kohnen, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 44 (08) : 942 - 948
  • [24] Postoperative outcomes of intraocular lens implantation in the bag versus posterior optic capture in pediatric cataract surgery
    Vasavada, Abhay R.
    Vasavada, Vaishali
    Shah, Sajani K.
    Trivedi, Rupal H.
    Vasavada, Viraj A.
    Vasavada, Shail A.
    Srivastava, Samaresh
    Sudhalkar, Aditya
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 43 (09) : 1177 - 1183
  • [25] Update on pediatric cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation
    Lin, Alice A.
    Buckley, Edward G.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 21 (01) : 55 - 59
  • [26] Paediatric intraocular lens implants: accuracy of lens power calculations
    O'Gallagher, M. K.
    Lagan, M. A.
    Mulholland, C. P.
    Parker, M.
    McGinnity, G.
    McLoone, E. M.
    EYE, 2016, 30 (09) : 1215 - 1220
  • [27] Toric intraocular lens power calculation in cataract patients with keratoconus
    Ton, Yokrat
    Barrett, Graham D.
    Kleinmann, Guy
    Levy, Adi
    Assia, Ehud I.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 47 (11) : 1389 - 1397
  • [28] Challenges in pediatric cataract surgery: comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas using optical biometry
    Yilmaz, Ibrahim Edhem
    Kimyon, Sabit
    Mete, Alper
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 42 (10) : 3071 - 3077
  • [29] New-Generation Multifocal Intraocular Lens for Pediatric Cataract
    Abouzeid, Hana
    Moetteli, Leila
    Munier, Francis L.
    OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2013, 230 (02) : 100 - 107
  • [30] Full-Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens Posterior Optic Capture for Selected Pediatric Cataracts
    Huang, Yusen
    Dong, Xiaojin
    Zhang, Jing
    Wan, Xiaomei
    Wang, Menghan
    Xie, Lixin
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 37 (06) : 390 - +