On the Two Approaches to Incorporate Wave-Particle Resonant Effects Into Global Test Particle Simulations

被引:4
作者
Lukin, A. S. [1 ,2 ]
Artemyev, A. V. [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, X. J. [1 ,3 ]
Allanson, O. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Tao, X. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Dallas, Dept Phys, Richardson, TX 75080 USA
[2] RAS, Space Res Inst, Moscow, Russia
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Earth Planetary & Space Sci, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Birmingham, Sch Engn, Space Environm & Radio Engn, Elect Elect & Syst Engn, Birmingham, England
[5] Univ Exeter, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Penryn, England
[6] Univ Exeter, Dept Math, Exeter, England
[7] Univ Sci & Technol China, Dept Geophys & Planetary Sci, Key Lab Geospace Environm, CAS, Hefei, Peoples R China
[8] Ctr Excellence Comparat Planetol, CAS, Hefei, Peoples R China
[9] Univ Sci & Technol China, Mengcheng Natl Geophys Observ, Hefei, Peoples R China
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会; 美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
whistler waves; wave-particle interactions; nonlinear effects; plasma injections; WHISTLER-MODE WAVES; OUTER RADIATION BELT; VAN ALLEN PROBES; ELECTRON ACCELERATION; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC SIMULATION; MAGNETIC-FIELD; MAGNETOTAIL; DIFFUSION; MHD; ENERGIZATION;
D O I
10.1029/2023JA032163
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Energetic electron dynamics in the Earth's radiation belts and near-Earth plasma sheet are controlled by multiple processes operating on very different time scales: from storm-time magnetic field reconfiguration on a timescale of hours to individual resonant wave-particle interactions on a timescale of milliseconds. The most advanced models for such dynamics either include test particle simulations in electromagnetic fields from global magnetospheric models, or those that solve the Fokker-Plank equation for long-term effects of wave-particle resonant interactions. The most prospective method, however, would be to combine these two classes of models, to allow the inclusion of resonant electron scattering into simulations of electron motion in global magnetospheric fields. However, there are still significant outstanding challenges that remain regarding how to incorporate the long term effects of wave-particle interactions in test-particle simulations. In this paper, we describe in details two approaches that incorporate electron scattering in test particle simulations: stochastic differential equation (SDE) approach and the mapping technique. Both approaches assume that wave-particle interactions can be described as a probabilistic process that changes electron energy, pitch-angle, and thus modifies the test particle dynamics. To compare these approaches, we model electron resonant interactions with field-aligned whistler-mode waves in dipole magnetic fields. This comparison shows advantages of the mapping technique in simulating the nonlinear resonant effects, but also underlines that more significant computational resources are needed for this technique in comparison with the SDE approach. We further discuss applications of both approaches in improving existing models of energetic electron dynamics. We discuss two approaches to incorporate resonant effects into test particle simulation models Detailed approaches have been shown for continuous stochastic differential equations (SDEs) and the mapping technique, respectively In contrast to continuous SDE, the mapping technique allows one to simulate nonlinear resonant effects
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Test particle simulations of resonant interactions between energetic electrons and discrete, multi-frequency artificial whistler waves in the plasmasphere [J].
Chang Shan-Shan ;
Ni Bin-Bin ;
Zhao Zheng-Yu ;
Gu Xu-Dong ;
Zhou Chen .
CHINESE PHYSICS B, 2014, 23 (08)
[42]   Comparison between test-particle simulations and test-particle theories for cosmic ray transport: III. Dynamical turbulence [J].
Gammon, M. ;
Heusen, M. ;
Shalchi, A. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 3 (01)
[43]   On the role of wave-particle interactions in the evolution of solar wind ion distribution functions [J].
Matteini, Lorenzo ;
Landi, Simone ;
Velli, Marco ;
Hellinger, Petr .
TWELFTH INTERNATIONAL SOLAR WIND CONFERENCE, 2010, 1216 :223-+
[44]   Quasilinear theory revisited: general kinetic formulation of wave-particle interactions in plasmas [J].
Hizanidis, Kyriakos ;
Kominis, Yannis ;
Ram, Abhay K. .
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2010, 52 (12)
[45]   The Implications of Temporal Variability in Wave-Particle Interactions in Earth's Radiation Belts [J].
Watt, C. E. J. ;
Allison, H. J. ;
Thompson, R. L. ;
Bentley, S. N. ;
Meredith, N. P. ;
Glauert, S. A. ;
Horne, R. B. ;
Rae, I. J. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 48 (01)
[46]   Software-type Wave-Particle Interaction Analyzer on board the Arase satellite [J].
Katoh, Yuto ;
Kojima, Hirotsugu ;
Hikishima, Mitsuru ;
Takashima, Takeshi ;
Asamura, Kazushi ;
Miyoshi, Yoshizumi ;
Kasahara, Yoshiya ;
Kasahara, Satoshi ;
Mitani, Takefumi ;
Higashio, Nana ;
Matsuoka, Ayako ;
Ozaki, Mitsunori ;
Yagitani, Satoshi ;
Yokota, Shoichiro ;
Matsuda, Shoya ;
Kitahara, Masahiro ;
Shinohara, Iku .
EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2018, 70
[47]   Kinetic equation for nonlinear wave-particle interaction: Solution properties and asymptotic dynamics [J].
Artemyev, Anton ;
Neishtadt, Anatoly ;
Vasiliev, Alexei .
PHYSICA D-NONLINEAR PHENOMENA, 2019, 393 :1-8
[48]   Test-Particle Simulations of Linear and Nonlinear Interactions Between a 2-D Whistler-Mode Wave Packet and Radiation Belt Electrons [J].
da Silva, C. L. ;
Denton, R. E. ;
Hudson, M. K. ;
Millan, R. M. ;
Liu, K. ;
Bortnik, J. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 45 (11) :5234-5245
[49]   Quantifying Wave-Particle Interactions in Collisionless Plasmas: Theory and Its Application to the Alfven-mode Wave [J].
Zhao, Jinsong ;
Lee, Louchuang ;
Xie, Huasheng ;
Yao, Yuhang ;
Wu, Dejin ;
Voitenko, Yuriy ;
Pierrard, Viviane .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 930 (01)
[50]   Accurately characterizing the importance of wave-particle interactions in radiation belt dynamics: The pitfalls of statistical wave representations [J].
Murphy, Kyle R. ;
Mann, Ian R. ;
Rae, I. Jonathan ;
Sibeck, David G. ;
Watt, Clare E. J. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2016, 121 (08) :7895-7899