Study on mixed silage of forage ramie and Pennisetum purpureum (Schum.) in different proportions

被引:1
作者
Deng, Huifen [1 ]
Hong, Lei [2 ]
Hu, Renke [1 ]
Zhang, Baizhong [2 ]
Kangle, Yi [2 ]
Ao, Sun [2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Biol & Electromech Polytech, Changsha 410130, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Inst Anim & Vet Sci, Changsha 410131, Peoples R China
来源
PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES | 2023年 / 60卷 / 03期
关键词
Forage ramie; silage; nutritional components; fermentation quality;
D O I
10.21162/PAKJAS/23.623
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
In the current study, ramie mixed silage with Pennisetum purpureum (sweet elephant grass) was stored for 45 days according to the mass percentage of ramie was 100 (CK), 80 (R8), 60 (R6) and 40 %(R4), respectively. The sensory evaluation and the analysis of nutrient composition and fermentation quality of forage ramie mixed silage were carried out to find the best mixing ratio of forage ramie mixed silage with sweet elephant grass. The results showed that the fermentation quality of mixed silage improved gradually with the decrease of ramie proportion, and the comprehensive sensory evaluation was all good grade 1 except CK. The nutrient composition of mixed silage of forage ramie and sweet elephant grass with different proportions changed greatly. CP content decreased with the increase of sweet elephant grass supplemental level, and there were significant differences among all treatment groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in NDF content among all groups. There were no significant differences in ADF content between CK and R-8, R-8 and R-6 (P>0.05), but there were significant differences between CK and R6, R4 and all treatment groups. There was no significant difference in Ash content among all groups (P>0.05). The pH value of control group (CK) was higher than that of other treatment groups, but there was no significant difference in pH value among all treatments (P>0.05). In terms of lactic acid, acetic acid and NH3-N/TN, there were no significant differences between R-8, R-6 and R-4 (P>0.05), but there were significant differences between them and CK. There was no significant difference in propionic acid treatment. No butyric acid was found in any treatment group. In this study, it was found that the quality of ramie mixed silage was obviously better than that of single silage, and the quality ratio of forage ramie was 60%.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 597
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] AUTOMATED SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF AMMONIA AND TOTAL AMINO-ACIDS IN RUMINAL FLUID AND INVITRO MEDIA
    BRODERICK, GA
    KANG, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1980, 63 (01) : 64 - 75
  • [2] Ruminal Fermentation Parameters and Microbial Community at Phylum Level Differently Influenced by Forage Types in Bulls
    Chen, Dong
    Tang, Qiyuan
    Huawei, Su
    Rahman, Muhammad Aziz ur
    Wu, Duan Qin
    Wan, Fachun
    Shen, Weijun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 24 (04) : 1025 - 1032
  • [3] Chongyu Z. W., 2015, Shandong Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, V36, P20
  • [4] Silage review: Recent advances and future technologies for baled silages
    Coblentz, W. K.
    Akins, M. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2018, 101 (05) : 4075 - 4092
  • [5] Despal Despal, 2011, Media Peternakan, V34, P69, DOI 10.5398/medpet.2011.34.1.69
  • [6] Gan W., 2019, Feed Research, V44, P44, DOI [10.13557/j.cnki.issn1002-2813.2021.17.011, DOI 10.13557/J.CNKI.ISSN1002-2813.2021.17.011]
  • [7] Gao Haijuan, 2016, China Feed, P16
  • [8] Silage review: Silage feeding management: Silage characteristics and dairy cow feeding behavior
    Grant, R. J.
    Ferraretto, L. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2018, 101 (05) : 4111 - 4121
  • [9] Guoqi Z., 2018, Analysis and Evaluation of forage and Feed, P221
  • [10] Haowei W., 2018, Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, V30, P293