Failure mode and effects analysis method based on Fermatean fuzzy weighted Muirhead mean operator

被引:5
作者
Zhong, Yuan [1 ]
Li, Guofa [1 ]
Chen, Chuanhai [1 ]
Liu, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Key Lab CNC Equipment Reliabil, Minist Educ, 5988 Renmin St, Changchun 130022, Jilin, Peoples R China
关键词
Failure mode and effects analysis; Muirhead mean operators; Fermatean fuzzy sets; Fermatean fuzzy weighted Muirhead mean; operator; HSE RISK PRIORITIZATION; FMEA APPROACH; INDUSTRY; SAFETY; SYSTEM; HEALTH; FTA;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110789
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is an important work in product reliability design. It can identify the weak links and key items in design through fault analysis, and provide basic information for evaluating and improving the reliability of system design. In view of the shortcomings of the existing FMEA method, such as the weak ability of experts to describe and process fuzzy information and the lack of consideration of the weight and correlation between risk factors. In this paper, by fusing Fermatean fuzzy sets (FFS) and Muirhead Mean (MM) operators, we propose Fermatean fuzzy weighted Muirhead mean (FFWMM) operator and develop a new FMEA method. Firstly, two new risk factors are proposed to overcome the shortcoming of insufficient consideration of the FMEA method. By introducing FFS, the ability of experts to express fuzzy information is enhanced. Using FFWMM operator to aggregate evaluation information can deal with the weight and correlation between influencing factors well. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the superiority of the proposed method. (c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] HSE risk prioritization of molybdenum operation process using extended FMEA approach based on Fuzzy BWM and Z-WASPAS
    Akbari R.
    Dabbagh R.
    Ghoushchi S.J.
    [J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2020, 38 (04): : 5157 - 5173
  • [2] Group decision-making with Fermatean fuzzy soft expert knowledge
    Akram, Muhammad
    Ali, Ghous
    Alcantud, Jose Carlos R.
    Riaz, Aneesa
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2022, 55 (07) : 5349 - 5389
  • [3] FUZZY - BASED MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS
    Al-Attar, Reem Tareq
    Al-Khafaji, Mahmoud Saleh
    Al-Ani, Faris H.
    [J]. CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 17 (02) : 654 - 672
  • [4] MORE ON INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS
    ATANASSOV, KT
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 33 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [5] Failure mode and effects analysis based on D numbers and TOPSIS
    Bian, Tian
    Zheng, Haoyang
    Yin, Likang
    Deng, Yong
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 34 (04) : 501 - 515
  • [6] Bonferroni C., 1950, BOLLETTINO DELLUNION, V5, P267
  • [7] An integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA
    Boral, Soumava
    Howard, Ian
    Chaturvedi, Sanjay K.
    McKee, Kristoffer
    Naikan, V. N. A.
    [J]. ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2020, 108
  • [8] Multiple Attribute Decision Making Based on Power Muirhead Mean Operators Under 2-Tuple Linguistic Pythagorean Fuzzy Environment
    Deng, Xiumei
    Wang, Jie
    Wei, Guiwu
    [J]. COGNITIVE COMPUTATION, 2020, 12 (06) : 1276 - 1298
  • [9] Detemple D.W., 1979, Angew. Chem., V47, P4638
  • [10] Eyuboglu OH, 2020, 2020 IEEE 2ND GLOBAL POWER, ENERGY AND COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (IEEE GPECOM2020), P251, DOI [10.1109/GPECOM49333.2020.9247887, 10.1109/gpecom49333.2020.9247887]