Numerical Assessment of a Two-Phase Model for Propulsive Pump Performance Prediction

被引:7
作者
Avanzi, Filippo [1 ]
Bau, Alberto [1 ]
De Vanna, Francesco [1 ]
Benini, Ernesto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Ind Engn, I-35131 Padua, Italy
关键词
axial-flow pump; waterjet; cavitation; two-phase flows; turbomachinery; computational fluid dynamics; numerical modelling; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; LEAKAGE VORTEX CAVITATION; FLOW; CLOUD; VALIDATION; TURBULENCE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/en16186592
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The present work provides a detailed numerical investigation of a turbopump for waterjet applications in cavitating conditions. In particular, the study focuses on the complexities of cavitation modelling, serving as a pivotal reference for future computational research, especially in off-design hydro-jet scenarios, and it aims to extend current model assessments of the existing methods, by disputing their standard formulations. Thus, a computational domain of a single rotor-stator blade passage is solved using steady-state Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations, coupled with one-, two-, and four-equation turbulence models, and compared with available measurements, encompassing both nominal and thrust breakdown conditions. Through grid dependency analysis, a medium refinement with the Shear Stress Transport turbulence model is chosen as the optimal configuration, reducing either computational time and relative error in breakdown efficiency to 1%. This arrangement is coupled with a systematic study of the Zwart cavitation model parameters through multipliers ranging from 10-2 to 102. Results reveal that properly tuning these values allows for a more accurate reconstruction of the initial phases of cavitation up to breakdown. Notably, increasing the nucleation radius reduces the difference between the estimated head rise and experimental values near breakdown, reducing the maximum error by 4%. This variation constrains vapour concentration, promoting cavitation volume extension in the passage. A similar observation occurs when modifying the condensation coefficient, whereas altering the vaporization coefficient yields opposite effects.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Ansys, 2022, Ansys CFX-Solver Theory Guide
[2]  
Ansys, 2022, Ansys Fluent Users Guide
[3]  
Ansys, 2022, Ansys CFX Reference Guide
[4]   SOME OBSERVATIONS OF TIP-VORTEX CAVITATION [J].
ARNDT, REA ;
ARAKERI, VH ;
HIGUCHI, H .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1991, 229 :269-289
[5]  
Athavale M.M., 2002, INT J ROTATING MACH, V8, P45, DOI [10.1155/s1023621x02000052, DOI 10.1155/S1023621X02000052]
[6]  
Avanzi F., 2021, Designs, DOI DOI 10.3390/DESIGNS5010011
[7]  
Avanzi F., 2022, AIAA SCITECH 2022 FO, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.2022-0182
[8]  
Avanzi F., 2021, 9 C COMP METH MAR EN, V1, DOI [10.2218/marine2021.6824, DOI 10.2218/MARINE2021.6824]
[9]   Large eddy simulation of tip leakage cavitating flow focusing on cavitation-vortex interaction with Cartesian cut-cell mesh method [J].
Bai, Xiao-rui ;
Cheng, Huai-yu ;
Ji, Bin ;
Long, Xin-ping .
JOURNAL OF HYDRODYNAMICS, 2018, 30 (04) :750-753
[10]  
Becnel A.J., 2009, Technical Report NSWCCD- 50-TR-2009/089