A survey of machine learning and deep learning in remote sensing of geological environment: Challenges, advances, and opportunities

被引:143
作者
Han, Wei [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaohan [1 ]
Wang, Yi [2 ]
Wang, Lizhe [1 ]
Huang, Xiaohui [1 ]
Li, Jun [1 ]
Wang, Sheng [1 ]
Chen, Weitao [1 ]
Li, Xianju [1 ]
Feng, Ruyi [1 ]
Fan, Runyu [1 ]
Zhang, Xinyu [1 ]
Wang, Yuewei [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Comp Sci, Wuhan 430078, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, Inst Geophys & Geomat, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Geological environment; Remote sensing; Machine learning; Deep learning; Geological applications; WATER INDEX NDWI; SATELLITE IMAGES; RANDOM FORESTS; LANDSAT-TM; CLASSIFICATION; NETWORK; GLACIER; RADAR; IDENTIFICATION; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.05.032
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Due to limited resources and environmental pollution, monitoring the geological environment has become essential for many countries' sustainable development. As various high-resolution remote-sensing (RS) imaging platforms are continuously available, the remote sensing of the geological environment (GERS) provides a finegrain, all-weather, and low-cost method for identifying geological elements. Mainstream machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods can extract high-level high-dimensional semantic information and thus supply an efficient tool for high-precision classification and recognition in many fields. Therefore, the integration of advanced methods and multi-source RS images for GERS interpretation has achieved remarkable breakthroughs during the past decades. However, to the best of our knowledge, a systematic survey of the advances of GERS interpretation regarding ML and DL methods is still lacking. Through the collection of extensive published research in this area, this survey outlines and analyzes the challenges, progress, and promising directions of GERS interpretation. Specifically, the main challenges and difficulties in identifying GERS elements are first summarized in four aspects: sufficient element characteristics and variations, complex context disturbance, RS image quality and types, and other limitations in GERS interpretation. Second, we systematically introduce various RS imaging platforms and advanced ML and DL methods for GERS interpretation. Third, the research status and trends of several GERS applications, including their use for lithology, soil, water, rock glacier, and geological disaster, are ultimately collected and compared. Finally, potential opportunities for future research are discussed. After the systematic and comprehensive review, the conclusive findings suggest that longtime large-scale GERS interpretation and corresponding change pattern analysis will be a significant future direction to meet the needs of environment improvement and sustainable development. To complete the above goals, a fusion of satellite, airplane, environmental monitoring, geological survey, and other types of data will provide enough discriminative information, and expert knowledge, GIS, and high-performance computing techniques will be helpful to improve the efficiency and generalizability of ML and DL methods for processing the multi-platform RS data.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 113
页数:27
相关论文
共 265 条
[11]  
Badrinarayanan V., 2015, IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2644615, DOI 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2644615]
[12]   Comparing Thresholding with Machine Learning Classifiers for Mapping Complex Water [J].
Bangira, Tsitsi ;
Alfieri, Silvia Maria ;
Menenti, Massimo ;
van Niekerk, Adriaan .
REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (11)
[13]   The Spectral Response of the Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager [J].
Barsi, Julia A. ;
Lee, Kenton ;
Kvaran, Geir ;
Markham, Brian L. ;
Pedelty, Jeffrey A. .
REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 6 (10) :10232-10251
[14]   Automated Extraction of Antarctic Glacier and Ice Shelf Fronts from Sentinel-1 Imagery Using Deep Learning [J].
Baumhoer, Celia A. ;
Dietz, Andreas J. ;
Kneisel, C. ;
Kuenzer, C. .
REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (21)
[15]   Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions [J].
Belgiu, Mariana ;
Dragut, Lucian .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 114 :24-31
[16]  
Bengio Y., 2007, P ADV NEUR INF PROC, V19, P153, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/7503.003.0024
[17]   Contribution of Alaskan glaciers to sea-level rise derived from satellite imagery [J].
Berthier, E. ;
Schiefer, E. ;
Clarke, G. K. C. ;
Menounos, B. ;
Remy, F. .
NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2010, 3 (02) :92-95
[18]   Geological remote sensing [J].
Bishop, Charlotte ;
Rivard, Benoit ;
de Souza Filho, Carlos ;
van der Meer, Freek .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2018, 64 :267-274
[19]   Satellite hyperspectral remote sensing for estimating estuarine and coastal water quality [J].
Brando, VE ;
Dekker, AG .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 41 (06) :1378-1387
[20]   Benchmarking classifiers to optimally integrate terrain analysis and multispectral remote sensing in automatic rock glacier detection [J].
Brenning, Alexander .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 113 (01) :239-247