Assessment of Power System Asset Dispatch under Different Local Energy Community Business Models

被引:5
作者
Korotko, Tarmo [1 ,2 ]
Plaum, Freddy [2 ,3 ]
Haering, Tobias [2 ,3 ]
Mutule, Anna [1 ]
Lazdins, Roberts [1 ]
Borscevskis, Olegs [1 ]
Rosin, Argo [2 ]
Carroll, Paula [4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Phys Energet, Smart Grid Res Ctr, LV-1006 Riga, Latvia
[2] Tallinn Univ Technol, FinEst Ctr Smart Cities, Ehitajate Rd 5, EE-19086 Tallinn, Estonia
[3] Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Elect Power Engn & Mechatron, Ehitajate Rd 5, EE-19086 Tallinn, Estonia
[4] Univ Coll Dublin, Coll Business, Dublin D04V1W8, Ireland
关键词
local energy community; asset dispatch; optimisation; energy management; battery energy storage; renewable energy sources; power system flexibility; EUROPE;
D O I
10.3390/en16083476
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Community energy projects have gained popularity in recent years, and encouraging citizens to form local energy communities (LEC) is considered an effective tool for raising awareness about renewable energy. Since no single universal method exists for operating LECs, this study investigated the impact that different business models and asset dispatch methods have on LECs' economic and energy-related indicators. We carried out a case study, which included the development, modelling, and simulation of seven scenarios using mixed-integer linear programming (MILP). To measure and compare the prospective performance of the LECs in each scenario, six key metrics were evaluated and assessed. The authors find that simple, rule-based control systems might be well suited for LECs with a limited number of controllable assets that aim to provide increased levels of self-consumption of up to 3%. We also conclude that when the LEC utilises an energy cooperative business model, the selected asset dispatch method provides only minor differences in LEC performance, while for prosumer communities, the importance of selecting a suitable asset dispatch method is higher. We also conclude that LECs have the potential to significantly increase their economic performance by more than 10% by acting as aggregators and providing grid services directly to system operators.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Ahmadiahangar R, 2020, COMPAT POW ELECTR, P456, DOI [10.1109/CPE-POWERENG48600.2020.9161667, 10.1109/cpe-powereng48600.2020.9161667]
  • [2] Energy Storage Expansion Planning In Microgrid
    Ahmadiahangar, Roya
    Baharvandi, Amir
    Rosin, Argo
    Haring, Tobias
    Azizi, Elnaz
    Korotko, Tarmo
    Shabbir, Noman
    [J]. 2020 IEEE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPATIBILITY, POWER ELECTRONICS AND POWER ENGINEERING (CPE-POWERENG), VOL 1, 2020, : 433 - 437
  • [3] [Anonymous], OPENADR PRIM INTR AU
  • [4] Bahlke F, 2016, INT CONF ACOUST SPEE, P2479, DOI 10.1109/ICASSP.2016.7472123
  • [5] What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives
    Bauwens, Thomas
    Gotchev, Boris
    Holstenkamp, Lars
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 13 : 136 - 147
  • [6] What is prosumerism for? Exploring the normative dimensions of decentralised energy transitions
    Brown, Donal
    Hall, Stephen
    Davis, Mark E.
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 66
  • [7] Prosumers in the post subsidy era: an exploration of new prosumer business models in the UK
    Brown, Donal
    Hall, Stephen
    Davis, Mark E.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 135
  • [8] Caramizaru A, 2020, ENERGY COMMUNITIES O, DOI [10.2760/180576, DOI 10.2760/180576]
  • [9] Casals X.G., 2019, SMART ENERGY COMMUNI
  • [10] Drovtar I., 2022, P 2022 IEEE 7 INT EN, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/ENERGYCON53164.2022.9830444