Fast model-based scenario optimization in NSTX-U enabled by analytic gradient computation

被引:2
作者
Leard, Brian R. [1 ]
Paruchuri, Sai Tej [1 ]
Rafiq, Tariq [1 ]
Schuster, Eugenio [1 ]
机构
[1] Lehigh Univ, Mech Engn & Engn Mech, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
关键词
Feedforward optimization; Scenario planning; Analytic gradients; NSTX-U;
D O I
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2023.113606
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Model-based optimization offers a systematic approach to advanced scenario planning. In this case, the feedforward-control inputs (actuator trajectories) that are needed to attain and sustain a desired scenario are obtained by solving a nonlinear constrained optimization problem. This class of problems generally minimize a cost function that measures the difference between desired and actual plasma states. Several numerical optimization algorithms, such as sequential quadratic programming, require repeated calculation of the cost function gradients with respect to the input trajectories. Calculating these gradients numerically can be computationally intensive, increasing the time needed to solve the feedforward-control optimization problem. This work introduces a method to analytically calculate these cost function gradients from the current profile evolution model. This can significantly reduce the computational time and allow for fast feedforward-control optimization, which would eventually enable optimal scenario planning between discharges. The performance of the feedforward optimizer with analytical gradients is compared to a traditional optimization algorithm based on numerical gradients for different NSTX-U scenarios. The plasma dynamics in the optimization algorithm are simulated using the Control Oriented Transport SIMulator (COTSIM). Results of the work show that analytical gradients consistently reduce the computation time while achieving trajectories that are comparable to those obtained by traditional optimization algorithms based on numerical gradients.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Arora J., 2004, Introduction To Optimum Design
[2]  
Barton J.E., 2014, 19 IFAC WORLD C CAPE, P671
[3]   Physics-based control-oriented modeling and robust feedback control of the plasma safety factor profile and stored energy dynamics in ITER [J].
Barton, Justin E. ;
Besseghir, Karim ;
Lister, Jo ;
Schuster, Eugenio .
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2015, 57 (11)
[4]   Non-linear model-based optimization of actuator trajectories for tokamak plasma profile control [J].
Felici, F. ;
Sauter, O. .
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2012, 54 (02)
[5]   Exploration of the equilibrium operating space for NSTX-Upgrade [J].
Gerhardt, S. P. ;
Andre, R. ;
Menard, J. E. .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 2012, 52 (08)
[6]   THEORY OF PLASMA TRANSPORT IN TOROIDAL CONFINEMENT SYSTEMS [J].
HINTON, FL ;
HAZELTINE, RD .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 1976, 48 (02) :239-308
[7]  
ILHAN Z O., 2016, Model-based Optimization and Feedback Control of the Current Density Profile Evolution in NSTX-U
[8]   Physics-based control-oriented modeling of the current density profile evolution in NSTX-Upgrade [J].
Ilhan, Zeki O. ;
Barton, Justin E. ;
Schuster, Eugenio ;
Gates, David A. ;
Gerhardt, Stefan P. ;
Menard, Jonathan E. .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2017, 123 :564-568
[9]   Combined magnetic and kinetic control of advanced tokamak steady state scenarios based on semi-empirical modelling [J].
Moreau, D. ;
Artaud, J. F. ;
Ferron, J. R. ;
Holcomb, C. T. ;
Humphreys, D. A. ;
Liu, F. ;
Luce, T. C. ;
Park, J. M. ;
Prater, R. ;
Turco, F. ;
Walker, M. L. .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 2015, 55 (06)
[10]   Towards model-based current profile control at DIII-D [J].
Ou, Y. ;
Luce, T. C. ;
Schuster, E. ;
Ferron, J. R. ;
Walker, M. L. ;
Xu, C. ;
Humphreys, D. A. .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2007, 82 (5-14) :1153-1160