Bibliometrics Analysis of Research on Argumentation in Mathematics Education

被引:1
作者
Kartika, Hendra [1 ,2 ]
Teguh, Mega [3 ]
Fuad, Yusuf [3 ]
Bonyah, Ebenezer [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Negeri Surabaya, Doctoral Program, Surabaya 60231, East Java, Indonesia
[2] Univ Singaperbangsa Karawang, Karawang 41361, West Java, Indonesia
[3] Univ Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya 60231, East Java, Indonesia
[4] Akenten Appiah Menka Univ Skills Training & Entrep, Dept Math Educ, Kumasi, Ghana
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION IN MATHEMATICS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2023年 / 11卷 / 05期
关键词
Argumentation; Bibliometrics; Mathematics education; Scopus; STUDENTS; TEACHERS; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.46328/ijemst.2904
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study is based on the bibliometrics analysis of research publications that focus on highlighting the argumentation on mathematics education. The main objective of this study is to analyze the distribution of research results, the main journals for publication, and the most productive authors, the pattern of authorship and the pattern of citation. Data was collected from Scopus database and was analyzed using VOSviewer software. A total of 173 articles published from 1995 to December 2021 were retrieved and perused. Graphs, tables, charts, and maps have been used to analyze and present collected data. The analysis results show that argumentation in mathematics education has been studied frequently with the concepts of proof, reasoning, teacher education, and geometry. Journal of Mathematical Behavior and Educational Studies in Mathematics have been the top journals, and the University of Rutgers has been the most influential institution, and the United States has had a significant prevalence in this field. The results of this study provide insights for researchers interested in mathematics education in this field, suggesting that they can explore various alternatives to the major research trends and the influential articles mentioned. Based on the results, recommendations for future studies are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:1346 / 1365
页数:21
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Common Core State Standards for Mathematics
[2]   Mathematics teachers' attention to potential classroom situations of argumentation [J].
Ayalon, Michal ;
Hershkowitz, Rina .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BEHAVIOR, 2018, 49 :163-173
[3]   FACTORS SHAPING STUDENTS' OPPORTUNITIES TO ENGAGE IN ARGUMENTATIVE ACTIVITY [J].
Ayalon, Michal ;
Even, Ruhama .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2016, 14 (03) :575-601
[4]   Visualizing knowledge domains [J].
Börner, K ;
Chen, CM ;
Boyack, KW .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 :179-255
[5]   Proof and argumentation in K-12 mathematics: a review of conceptions, content, and support [J].
Campbell, Tye G. ;
Boyle, Justin D. ;
King, Shande .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL EDUCATION IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 51 (05) :754-774
[6]  
Cardetti F., 2018, PRIMUS, V29, P775, DOI [10.1080/10511970.2018.1482581, DOI 10.1080/10511970.2018.1482581]
[7]   Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students' engagement in mathematical activities [J].
Conner, AnnaMarie ;
Singletary, Laura M. ;
Smith, Ryan C. ;
Wagner, Patty Anne ;
Francisco, Richard T. .
EDUCATIONAL STUDIES IN MATHEMATICS, 2014, 86 (03) :401-429
[8]   Research on lifelong learning in Southeast Asia: A bibliometrics review between 1972 and 2019 [J].
Do, Thi-Trinh ;
Thi Tinh, Phan ;
Tran-Thi, Ha-Giang ;
Bui, Duc Minh ;
Pham, Thi Oanh ;
Nguyen-Le, Van-An ;
Nguyen, Tien-Trung .
COGENT EDUCATION, 2021, 8 (01)
[9]   Argumentation in preschool: a common ground for collaborative learning in early childhood [J].
Dovigo, Fabio .
EUROPEAN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2016, 24 (06) :818-840
[10]   When bibliometrics met mathematics education research: the case of instrumental orchestration [J].
Drijvers, Paul ;
Grauwin, Sebastian ;
Trouche, Luc .
ZDM-MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2020, 52 (07) :1455-1469