共 60 条
Using a target as external focus of attention results in a better jump-landing technique in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-A cross-over study
被引:2
作者:
van Weert, Maria Baektoft
[1
]
Rathleff, Michael Skovdal
[1
,2
,3
]
Eppinga, Peter
[4
]
Molgaard, Carsten Moller
[3
]
Welling, Wouter
[5
,6
]
机构:
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ, Ctr Gen Practice, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Dept Physiotherapy & Occupat Therapy, Aalborg, Denmark
[4] Med Ctr Zuid MCZ, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Ctr Human Movement Sci, A Deusinglaan 1, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[6] Prof F Fysiotherapie, Enschede, Netherlands
来源:
关键词:
Anterior cruciate ligament;
Rehabilitation;
Attentional focus;
Jump-landing technique;
CLINICAL-ASSESSMENT TOOL;
KNEE-JOINT KINEMATICS;
ACL RECONSTRUCTION;
BIOMECHANICAL MEASURES;
FUNCTIONAL DEFICITS;
FEEDBACK TECHNIQUES;
INJURY PREVENTION;
RETURN;
RISK;
PERFORMANCE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.knee.2023.04.016
中图分类号:
R826.8 [整形外科学];
R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学];
R726.2 [小儿整形外科学];
R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Improving jump-landing technique during rehabilitation is important and may be achieved through different feedback techniques, i.e., internal focus of attention (IF) or external focus of attention using a target (EF). However, there is a lack of evidence on the most effective feedback technique after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential difference in jumplanding techniques between IF and EF instructions in patients after ACLR. Methods: Thirty patients (12 females, mean age 23.26 +/- 4.91 years) participated after ACLR. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups that each followed a different testing sequence. Patients performed a drop vertical jump-landing test after receiving instructions with varying types of focus of attention. The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) assessed the jump-landing technique. Results: EF was associated with a significantly better LESS score (P < 0.001) compared with IF. Only EF instructions led to improvements in jump-landing technique. Conclusion: Using a target as EF resulted in a significantly better jump-landing technique than IF in patients after ACLR. This indicates that increased use of EF could or might result in a better treatment outcome during ACLR rehabilitation. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 399
页数:10
相关论文