Effects of bariatric surgery on breast density in adult obese women: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Sun, Dezheng [1 ]
Huang, Zhiping [2 ]
Dong, Wenyan [1 ]
Zhao, Xiang [1 ]
Liu, Chaoqian [1 ]
Sheng, Yuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Med Univ, Changhai Hosp, Dept Thyroid & Breast Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Gen Hosp Southern Theater Command Peoples Liberat, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg & Organ Transplantat, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
bariatric surgery; breast density; obesity; mammogram; meta-analysis; FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; CANCER; RISK; ASSOCIATION; TISSUE; WEIGHT; DIET;
D O I
10.3389/fimmu.2023.1160809
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
IntroductionBariatric surgery is one of the most effective methods for treating obesity. It can effectively reduce body weight and reduce the incidence of obesity-related breast cancer. However, there are different conclusions about how bariatric surgery changes breast density. The purpose of this study was to clarify the changes in breast density from before to after bariatric surgery.MethodsThe relevant literature was searched through PubMed and Embase to screen for studies. Meta-analysis was used to clarify the changes in breast density from before to after bariatric surgery.ResultsA total of seven studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, including a total of 535 people. The average body mass index decreased from 45.3 kg/m(2) before surgery to 34.4 kg/m(2) after surgery. By the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System score, the proportion of grade A breast density from before to after bariatric surgery decreased by 3.83% (183 vs. 176), grade B (248 vs. 263) increased by 6.05%, grade C (94 vs. 89) decreased by 5.32%, and grade D (1 vs. 4) increased by 300%. There was no significant change in breast density from before to after bariatric surgery (OR=1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.74, 2.20], P=0.38). By the Volpara density grade score, postoperative volumetric breast density increased (standardized mean difference = -0.68, 95% CI [-1.08, -0.27], P = 0.001).DiscussionsBreast density increased significantly after bariatric surgery, but this depended on the method of detecting breast density. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to validate our conclusions.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Volumetric breast density characteristics as determined from digital mammograms [J].
Alonzo-Proulx, O. ;
Jong, R. A. ;
Yaffe, M. J. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (22) :7443-7457
[2]   Reliability of Automated Breast Density Measurements [J].
Alonzo-Proulx, Olivier ;
Mawdsley, Gordon E. ;
Patrie, James T. ;
Yaffe, Martin J. ;
Harvey, Jennifer A. .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 275 (02) :366-376
[3]   Assessment of mammographic breast density after sleeve gastrectomy [J].
Alvarez, Rafael ;
Ridelman, Elika ;
Rizk, Natalie ;
White, Morgan S. ;
Zhou, Chuan ;
Chan, Heang-Ping ;
Varban, Oliver A. ;
Helvie, Mark A. ;
Seeley, Randy J. .
SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2018, 14 (11) :1643-1651
[4]   Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice [J].
Berns, EA ;
Hendrick, RE ;
Cutter, GR .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) :830-834
[5]   Mammographic Density, Response to Hormones, and Breast Cancer Risk [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Melnichouk, Olga ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Hislop, Greg ;
Chiarelli, Anna M. ;
Yaffe, Martin J. ;
Minkin, Salomon .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (22) :2985-2992
[6]   Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening [J].
Brandt, Kathleen R. ;
Scott, Christopher G. ;
Ma, Lin ;
Mahmoudzadeh, Amir P. ;
Jensen, Matthew R. ;
Whaley, Dana H. ;
Wu, Fang Fang ;
Malkov, Serghei ;
Hruska, Carrie B. ;
Norman, Aaron D. ;
Heine, John ;
Shepherd, John ;
Pankratz, V. Shane ;
Kerlikowske, Karla ;
Vachon, Celine M. .
RADIOLOGY, 2016, 279 (03) :710-719
[7]   DIET, MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF BREAST-TISSUE, AND BREAST-CANCER RISK [J].
BRISSON, J ;
VERREAULT, R ;
MORRISON, AS ;
TENNINA, S ;
MEYER, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 130 (01) :14-24
[8]   Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide [J].
Burton, Anya ;
Maskarinec, Gertraud ;
Perez-Gomez, Beatriz ;
Vachon, Celine ;
Miao, Hui ;
Lajous, Martin ;
Lopez-Ridaura, Ruy ;
Rice, Megan ;
Pereira, Ana ;
Luisa Garmendia, Maria ;
Tamimi, Rulla M. ;
Bertrand, Kimberly ;
Kwong, Ava ;
Ursin, Giske ;
Lee, Eunjung ;
Qureshi, Samera A. ;
Ma, Huiyan ;
Vinnicombe, Sarah ;
Moss, Sue ;
Allen, Steve ;
Ndumia, Rose ;
Vinayak, Sudhir ;
Teo, Soo-Hwang ;
Mariapun, Shivaani ;
Fadzli, Farhana ;
Peplonska, Beata ;
Bukowska, Agnieszka ;
Nagata, Chisato ;
Stone, Jennifer ;
Hopper, John ;
Giles, Graham ;
Ozmen, Vahit ;
Aribal, Mustafa Erkin ;
Schuz, Joachim ;
Van Gils, Carla H. ;
Wanders, Johanna O. P. ;
Sirous, Reza ;
Sirous, Mehri ;
Hipwell, John ;
Kim, Jisun ;
Lee, Jong Won ;
Dickens, Caroline ;
Hartman, Mikael ;
Chia, Kee-Seng ;
Scott, Christopher ;
Chiarelli, Anna M. ;
Linton, Linda ;
Pollan, Marina ;
Flugelman, Anath Arzee ;
Salem, Dorria .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (06)
[9]   Active, but not passive cigarette smoking was inversely associated with mammographic density [J].
Butler, Lesley M. ;
Gold, Ellen B. ;
Conroy, Shannon M. ;
Crandall, Carolyn J. ;
Greendale, Gail A. ;
Oestreicher, Nina ;
Quesenberry, Charles P., Jr. ;
Habel, Laurel A. .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2010, 21 (02) :301-311
[10]   Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Concepts and Clinical Practice [J].
Chong, Alice ;
Weinstein, Susan P. ;
McDonald, Elizabeth S. ;
Conant, Emily F. .
RADIOLOGY, 2019, 292 (01) :1-14