Accuracy of Blueprint software in predicting range of motion 1 year after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

被引:2
作者
Baumgarten, Keith M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Orthoped Inst, Sioux Falls, SD USA
[2] Univ South Dakota, Dept Surg, Sanford Sch Med, Sioux Falls, SD USA
[3] Orthoped Inst, 810 E 23rd St, Sioux Falls, SD 57117 USA
关键词
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; Blueprint; computed tomography; range of motion; prediction; PREOPERATIVE PLANNING SOFTWARE; GLENOID COMPONENT POSITION; INTERNAL-ROTATION; IMPLANT SIZE; OUTCOMES; IMPINGEMENT; RELIABILITY; LEADS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2022.12.009
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Hypothesis and Background: Blueprint 3-dimensional computed tomography software has a functionality that predicts impingement -free range of motion (ROM) with determination of the limits of ROM at which bone and/or prosthetic impingement occurs. To our knowledge, only 1 previously published study has assessed the ability of Blueprint software to predict actual postoperative ROM after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). The hypotheses of this study were that (1) mean Blueprint-predicted impingement -free ROM would be statistically similar to the mean actual ROM 1 year after RTSA and (2) there would be a correlation between Blueprint-predicted impingement-free ROM and the actual ROM 1 year after RTSA.Materials and methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent Blueprint planning prior to undergoing RTSA from March 2017 through May 2021 was performed. At 1-year follow-up, flexion, external rotation at the side, abduction, external rotation in the abducted position, internal rotation in the abducted position, and internal rotation behind the back were measured. The preoperatively predicted flexion, extension, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation were recorded using Blueprint software. The group 1 analysis examined the predicted vs. actual ROM of all 127 patients regardless of whether intraoperative component modifications were made. The group 2 analysis examined the predicted vs. actual ROM of only the patients who did not undergo intraoperative changes that would affect the preoperative ROM prediction (n = 97). The group 3 analysis examined the predicted vs. actual ROM of group 2 combined with the 30 patients who underwent post hoc Blueprint planning modifications to account for the changes made intraoperatively (combined sample size of 127).Results: Of the 141 patients, 127 (90%) were available for 1-year follow-up. When the mean values of all 3 groups were examined, the actual ROM and predicted ROM were statistically significantly different (P < .0001) for flexion, external rotation, abduction, abduction-external rotation, and abduction-internal rotation. In group 1, a very weak or poor correlation was found between predicted internal rotation and actual abducted internal rotation (r = 0.19, P = .04). For all other ROM metrics in groups 1, 2, and 3, there were no correlations between predicted and actual ROM (P > .07). Conclusions: In its current state, preoperative Blueprint 3-dimensional computed tomography planning software is unable to accurately predict ROM 1 year after RTSA.Level of evidence: Basic Science Study; Validation of Computer Modeling System (c) 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1088 / 1094
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, TORNIER BLUEPRINT 3D
[2]   The Accuracy of Three-Dimensional CT Scan Software in Predicting Prosthetic Utilization in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty [J].
Baumgarten, Keith M. ;
Radtke, Logan .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (02) :E223-E232
[3]   Preoperative planning for accurate glenoid component positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty [J].
Berhouet, J. ;
Gulotta, L. V. ;
Dines, D. M. ;
Craig, E. ;
Warren, R. F. ;
Choi, D. ;
Chen, X. ;
Kontaxis, A. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2017, 103 (03) :407-413
[4]   Defining the younger patient: age as a predictive factor for outcomes in shoulder arthroplasty [J].
Brewley, Earl E., Jr. ;
Christmas, Kaitlyn N. ;
Gorman, Allen, II ;
Downes, Katheryne L. ;
Mighell, Mark A. ;
Frankle, Mark A. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (07) :S1-S8
[5]   Measurement of shoulder activity level [J].
Brophy, RH ;
Beauvais, RL ;
Jones, EC ;
Cordasco, FA ;
Marx, RG .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2005, (439) :101-108
[6]   Reliability and accuracy of templating the proximal humeral component for shoulder arthroplasty [J].
Buzzell, Jonathan E. ;
Lutton, David M. ;
Shyr, Yu ;
Neviaser, Robert J. ;
Lee, Donald H. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2009, 18 (05) :728-733
[7]   Radiologic Results of Three-Dimensional Templating for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty [J].
Cho, Sung-Hyun ;
Jeong, Jinyoung .
CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (02) :232-237
[8]   Computer-Assisted Preoperative Planning: The Future Is Now! [J].
Edwards, T. Bradley .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 97A (08)
[9]   Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the measurement of shoulder internal rotation by vertebral level [J].
Edwards, TB ;
Bostick, RD ;
Greene, CC ;
Baratta, RV ;
Drez, D .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2002, 11 (01) :40-42
[10]   Does commercially available shoulder arthroplasty preoperative planning software agree with surgeon measurements of version, inclination, and subluxation? [J].
Erickson, Brandon J. ;
Chalmers, Peter N. ;
Denard, Patrick ;
Lederman, Evan ;
Horneff, Gabriel ;
Werner, Brian C. ;
Provencher, Matthew T. ;
Romeo, Anthony A. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (02) :413-420