Functional Dissection of the Physiological Traits Promoting Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) Tolerance to Drought Stress

被引:6
作者
Ltaief, Salim [1 ,2 ]
Krouma, Abdelmajid [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sidi Ahmed Zarroug, Fac Sci Gafsa, Gafsa 2112, Tunisia
[2] Fac Sci & Tech, Sidi Bouzid 9100, Tunisia
[3] Fac Sci Sfax, Rd Soukra km 4 BP, Sfax 11713000, Tunisia
来源
PLANTS-BASEL | 2023年 / 12卷 / 07期
关键词
drought susceptible index; drought tolerance index; durum wheat; photosynthesis; proline; relative osmolyte content; WATER-DEFICIT; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; YIELD; RESPONSES; GROWTH; PLANTS; CONDUCTANCE; LIMITATIONS; SUNFLOWER; PROLINE;
D O I
10.3390/plants12071420
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
In Tunisia's arid and semi-arid lands, drought stress remains the most critical factor limiting agricultural production due to low and irregular precipitation. The situation is even more difficult because of the scarcity of underground water for irrigation and the climate change that has intensified and expanded the aridity. One of the most efficient and sustainable approaches to mitigating drought stress is exploring genotypic variability to screen tolerant genotypes and identify useful tolerance traits. To this end, six Tunisian wheat genotypes (Triticum durum Desf.) were cultivated in the field, under a greenhouse and natural light, to be studied for their differential tolerance to drought stress. Many morpho-physiological and biochemical traits were analyzed, and interrelationships were established. Depending on the genotypes, drought stress significantly decreased plant growth, chlorophyll biosynthesis, and photosynthesis; stimulated osmolyte accumulation and disturbed water relations. The most tolerant genotypes (salim and karim) accumulated more potassium (K) and proline in their shoots, allowing them to maintain better tissue hydration and physiological functioning. The osmotic adjustment (OA), in which potassium and proline play a key role, determines wheat tolerance to drought stress. The calculated drought index (DI), drought susceptible index (DSI), drought tolerance index (DTI), K use efficiency (KUE), and water use efficiency (WUE) discriminated the studied genotypes and confirmed the relative tolerance of salim and karim.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Abdalla M. M., 2011, Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, V2, P207, DOI 10.5251/abjna.2011.2.2.207.220
[2]   Physiological responses of wheat to drought stress and its mitigation approaches [J].
Ahmad, Zahoor ;
Waraich, Ejaz Ahmad ;
Akhtar, Sajjad ;
Anjum, Shazia ;
Ahmad, Tanveer ;
Mahboob, Wajid ;
Hafeez, Osama Bin Abdul ;
Tapera, Terence ;
Labuschagne, Maryke ;
Rizwan, Muhammad .
ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM, 2018, 40 (04)
[3]   Seasonal photosynthetic response of European beech to severe summer drought: Limitation, recovery and post-drought stimulation [J].
Arend, Matthias ;
Sever, Krunoslav ;
Pflug, Ellen ;
Gessler, Arthur ;
Schaub, Marcus .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2016, 220 :83-89
[4]   Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance [J].
Ashraf, M. ;
Foolad, M. R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2007, 59 (02) :206-216
[5]   A RE-EXAMINATION OF RELATIVE TURGIDITY TECHNIQUE FOR ESTIMATING WATER DEFICITS IN LEAVES [J].
BARRS, HD ;
WEATHERLEY, PE .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1962, 15 (03) :413-&
[6]   RAPID DETERMINATION OF FREE PROLINE FOR WATER-STRESS STUDIES [J].
BATES, LS ;
WALDREN, RP ;
TEARE, ID .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1973, 39 (01) :205-207
[7]  
Bendarradji L., 2016, REV AGRIC, V11, P278
[8]  
Bhatt R. M., 2005, Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, V10, P54
[9]   Drought-Adaptive Mechanisms of Young Sweet Cherry Trees in Response to Withholding and Resuming Irrigation Cycles [J].
Blaya-Ros, Pedro Jose ;
Blanco, Victor ;
Torres-Sanchez, Roque ;
Domingo, Rafael .
AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (09)
[10]   42K analysis of sodium-induced potassium efflux in barley: mechanism and relevance to salt tolerance [J].
Britto, Dev T. ;
Ebrahimi-Ardebili, Sasha ;
Hamam, Ahmed M. ;
Coskun, Devrim ;
Kronzucker, Herbert J. .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2010, 186 (02) :373-384