Using Sentiment Analysis to Understand Public Policy Nicknames: Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act

被引:2
|
作者
Lappeman, James [1 ]
Goder, Aliah [1 ]
Naicker, Kalencia [1 ]
Faruki, Hamza [1 ]
Gordon, Patrick [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, UCT Liberty Inst Strateg Mkt, Cape Town, South Africa
[2] DataEQ, Cape Town, South Africa
关键词
Sentiment analysis; public policy; natural language processing; social media; Obamacare; Affordable Care Act; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; POLITICS; PLACE; AVENUES;
D O I
10.1080/10495142.2023.2178588
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this study, we compared the social media net sentiment of one policy with two names. Specifically, we analyzed Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to understand how social media users engaged with each term on social media from March 2010 to March 2017. The net sentiment was measured with a sample of over 50 million micro-blogs, and the analysis was done using a combination of digital instruments and human validation. We found a significant difference between the social media engagement and sentiment of both terms, with the ACA performing significantly better than Obamacare, despite Obamacare's higher conversation volume. With the ACA having an average of 26% less negative sentiment than Obamacare, the findings of this study emphasize the need to be careful when attaching nicknames to public policy. The findings also have implications for policymakers and politicians.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 363
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Public Health Nursing Practice in the Affordable Care Act Era: A National Survey
    Edmonds, Joyce K.
    Campbell, Lisa A.
    Gilder, Richard E.
    PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2017, 34 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [32] Using Twitter to Better Understand the Spatiotemporal Patterns of Public Sentiment: A Case Study in Massachusetts, USA
    Cao, Xiaodong
    MacNaughton, Piers
    Deng, Zhengyi
    Yin, Jie
    Zhang, Xi
    Allen, Joseph G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (02)
  • [33] Sentiment analysis of the United States public support of nuclear power on social media using large language models
    Kwon, O. Hwang
    Vu, Katie
    Bhargava, Naman
    Radaideh, Mohammed I.
    Cooper, Jacob
    Joynt, Veda
    Radaideh, Majdi I.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2024, 200
  • [34] Welfare State Eras, Policy Narratives, and the Role of Expertise: The Case of the Affordable Care Act in Historical and Comparative Perspective
    Tuohy, Carolyn Hughes
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 2018, 43 (03) : 427 - 453
  • [35] Unraveling from Within? The Affordable Care Act and Self-Undermining Policy Feedbacks
    Oberlander, Jonathan
    Weaver, R. Kent
    FORUM-A JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN CONTEMPORARY POLITICS, 2015, 13 (01): : 37 - 62
  • [36] How Intense Policy Demanders Shape Postreform Politics: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act
    Rocco, Philip
    Haeder, Simon F.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 2018, 43 (02) : 271 - 304
  • [37] How Does the Public React to the Electric Vehicle Tax Incentive Policy? A Sentiment Analysis
    Wibowo, Agung Septia
    Septiari, Dovi
    JOURNAL OF TAX REFORM, 2023, 9 (03): : 413 - 429
  • [38] The impact of the affordable care act on breast cancer care in the USA: A multi-institutional analysis
    Maxwell, Jessica
    Shats, Oleg
    Aldridge, Joshua
    Lyden, Elizabeth
    Krie, Amy
    Conklin, Richard
    Manning, Kenneth
    Fahed, Rabih
    Vaziri, Irfan
    Deveras, Ruby Anne E.
    Mateen, Zubeena
    Crow, Kate
    Bjorling, Vince
    Meschi, Joseph T.
    Makoni, Stephen
    Kruter, Flavio
    Cowan, Kenneth
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (05) : 948 - 952
  • [39] The Affordable Care Act: policy predictors of integrated care between Hispanic-serving and mainstream mental health organizations
    Rosales, Robert
    Calvo, Rocio
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [40] Analysis of Public Sentiment on COVID-19 Vaccination Using Twitter
    Jayasurya, Gutti Gowri
    Kumar, Sanjay
    Singh, Binod Kumar
    Kumar, Vinay
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SYSTEMS, 2022, 9 (04) : 1101 - 1111