Top-down effect of dialogue coherence on perceived speaker identity

被引:2
|
作者
Warnke, Lena [1 ]
de Ruiter, Jan P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Dept Psychol, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Medford, MA USA
关键词
CHANGE DEAFNESS; VOICE; RECOGNITION; INDIVIDUALITY; ORGANIZATION; VARIABILITY; ATTENTION; LANGUAGE; PACKAGE;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-30435-z
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A key mechanism in the comprehension of conversation is the ability for listeners to recognize who is speaking and when a speaker switch occurs. Some authors suggest that speaker change detection is accomplished through bottom-up mechanisms in which listeners draw on changes in the acoustic features of the auditory signal. Other accounts propose that speaker change detection involves drawing on top-down linguistic representations to identify who is speaking. The present study investigates these hypotheses experimentally by manipulating the pragmatic coherence of conversational utterances. In experiment 1, participants listened to pairs of utterances and had to indicate whether they heard the same or different speakers. Even though all utterances were spoken by the same speaker, our results show that when two segments of conversation are spoken by the same speaker but make sense for different speakers to say, listeners report hearing different speakers. In experiment 2 we removed pragmatic information from the same stimuli by scrambling word order while leaving acoustic information intact. In contrast to experiment 1, results from the second experiment indicate no difference between our experimental conditions. We interpret these results as a top-down effect of pragmatic expectations: knowledge of conversational structure at least partially determines a listener's perception of speaker changes in conversation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Top-Down Attention Guidance Shapes Action Encoding in the pSTS
    Stehr, Daniel A.
    Zhou, Xiaojue
    Tisby, Mariel
    Hwu, Patrick T.
    Pyles, John A.
    Grossman, Emily D.
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2021, 31 (07) : 3522 - 3535
  • [22] When Is Perception Top-Down and When Is It Not? Culture, Narrative, and Attention
    Senzaki, Sawa
    Masuda, Takahiko
    Ishii, Keiko
    COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2014, 38 (07) : 1493 - 1506
  • [23] The influence of semantic top-down processing in auditory verbal hallucinations
    Daalman, Kirstin
    Verkooijen, Sanne
    Derks, Eske M.
    Aleman, Andre
    Sommer, Iris E. C.
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2012, 139 (1-3) : 82 - 86
  • [24] Association between top-down skills and auditory processing tests
    Borges Murphy, Cristina Ferraz
    La Torre, Renata
    Schochat, Eliane
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2013, 79 (06) : 753 - 759
  • [25] Supervised framework for top-down color interest point detection
    Dadwhal, Yogeshwar Singh
    Kumar, Satish
    Sardana, Harish Kumar
    SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2020, 2 (08):
  • [26] Top-down brain circuits for operant bradycardia
    Yoshimoto, Airi
    Morikawa, Shota
    Kato, Eriko
    Takeuchi, Haruki
    Ikegaya, Yuji
    SCIENCE, 2024, 384 (6702) : 1361 - 1367
  • [27] On the limits of top-down control of visual selection
    Theeuwes, Jan
    Van der Burg, Erik
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2011, 73 (07) : 2092 - 2103
  • [28] A top-down saliency model with goal relevance
    Tanner, James
    Itti, Laurent
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2019, 19 (01): : 1 - 16
  • [29] On the limits of top-down control of visual selection
    Jan Theeuwes
    Erik Van der Burg
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2011, 73 : 2092 - 2103
  • [30] The limits of top-down control of visual attention
    Van der Stigchel, Stefan
    Belopolsky, Artem V.
    Peters, Judith C.
    Wijnen, Jasper G.
    Meeter, Martijn
    Theeuwes, Jan
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2009, 132 (03) : 201 - 212