Somatosensory input in the context of transcranial magnetic stimulation coupled with electroencephalography: An evidence-based overview

被引:11
|
作者
Mancuso, M. [1 ]
Cruciani, A. [2 ,3 ]
Sveva, V. [4 ]
Casula, E. P. [5 ]
Brown, K. [6 ]
Rothwell, J. C. [7 ]
Di Lazzaro, V. [2 ,3 ]
Koch, G. [8 ]
Rocchi, L. [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rome Sapienza, Dept Human Neurosci, Viale Univ 30, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Campus Biomed Roma, Dept Med & Surg, Unit Neurol Neurophysiol Neurobiol & Psychiat, Via Alvaro Portillo, 21, I-00128 Rome, Italy
[3] Fdn Policlin Univ Campus Biomed, Via Alvaro Portillo 200, I-00128 Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Rome Sapienza, Dept Anat & Histol Sci Legal Med & Orthoped, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[5] Tor Vergata Univ Rome, Dept Syst Med, Via Montpellier 1, I-00133 Rome, Italy
[6] Univ Waterloo, Dept Kinesiol, 200 Univ Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G5, Canada
[7] UCL, UCL Queen Sq Inst Neurol, Dept Clin & Movement Neurosci, London WC1N 3BG, England
[8] IRCCS Santa Lucia Fdn, Noninvas Brain Stimulat Unit, Via Ardeatina 306-354, I-00179 Rome, Italy
[9] Univ Cagliari, Dept Med Sci & Publ Hlth, Cittadella Univ Monserrato Blocco 1 SS,554 Bivio S, I-09042 Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
关键词
Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Electroencephalography; TMS-EEG; Somatosensory stimulation; Evoked potentials; Cranial nerves; Trigeminal nerve; Facial nerve; CORTICAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS; FACIAL-NERVE; TMS-EEG; PHYSIOLOGICAL-CHARACTERISTICS; TRIGEMINAL NERVE; MOTOR CORTEX; RESPONSES; MUSCLE; BRAIN; COIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105434
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The transcranial evoked potential (TEP) is a powerful technique to investigate brain dynamics, but some methodological issues limit its interpretation. A possible contamination of the TEP by electroencephalographic (EEG) responses evoked by the somatosensory input generated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been postulated; nonetheless, a characterization of these responses is lacking. The aim of this work was to review current evidence about possible somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) induced by sources of somatosensory input in the craniofacial region. Among these, only contraction of craniofacial muscle and stimulation of free cutaneous nerve endings may be able to induce EEG responses, but direct evidence is lacking due to experimental difficulties in isolating these inputs. Notably, EEG evoked activity in this context is represented by a N100/P200 complex, reflecting a saliency-related multimodal response, rather than specific activation of the primary somatosensory cortex. Strategies to minimize or remove these responses by EEG processing still yield uncertain results; therefore, data inspection is of paramount importance to judge a possible contamination of the TEP by multimodal potentials caused by somatosensory input.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography sensory potentials
    Ross, Jessica M.
    Sarkar, Manjima
    Keller, Corey J.
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2022, 43 (17) : 5141 - 5153
  • [2] The influence of sensory potentials on transcranial magnetic stimulation - Electroencephalography recordings
    Chowdhury, Nahian S.
    Rogasch, Nigel C.
    Chiang, Alan K. I.
    Millard, Samantha K.
    Skippen, Patrick
    Chang, Wei-Ju
    Bilska, Katarzyna
    Si, Emily
    Seminowicz, David A.
    Schabrun, Siobhan M.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 140 : 98 - 109
  • [3] Evidence for interhemispheric imbalance in stroke patients as revealed by combining transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography
    Casula, Elias Paolo
    Pellicciari, Maria Concetta
    Bonni, Sonia
    Spano, Barbara
    Ponzo, Viviana
    Salsano, Ilenia
    Giulietti, Giovanni
    Martino Cinnera, Alex
    Maiella, Michele
    Borghi, Ilaria
    Rocchi, Lorenzo
    Bozzali, Marco
    Sallustio, Fabrizio
    Caltagirone, Carlo
    Koch, Giacomo
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2021, 42 (05) : 1343 - 1358
  • [4] Closed-loop optimization of transcranial magnetic stimulation with electroencephalography feedback
    Tervo, Aino E.
    Nieminen, Jaakko O.
    Lioumis, Pantelis
    Metsomaa, Johanna
    Souza, Victor H.
    Sinisalo, Heikki
    Stenroos, Matti
    Sarvas, Jukka
    Ilmoniemi, Risto J.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2022, 15 (02) : 523 - 531
  • [5] Opportunities for concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography to characterize cortical activity in stroke
    Sato, Sumire
    Bergmann, Til Ole
    Borich, Michael R.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9
  • [6] Reliability and Validity of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Electroencephalography Biomarkers
    Parmigiani, Sara
    Ross, Jessica M.
    Cline, Christopher C.
    Minasi, Christopher B.
    Gogulski, Juha
    Keller, Corey J.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY-COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING, 2023, 8 (08) : 805 - 814
  • [7] Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coupled with electroencephalography (EEG): Biomarker of the future
    Kimiskidis, V. K.
    REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE, 2016, 172 (02) : 123 - 126
  • [8] Combined transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography reveals alterations in cortical excitability during pain
    Chowdhury, Nahian Shahmat
    Chiang, Alan K., I
    Millard, Samantha K.
    Skippen, Patrick
    Chang, Wei-Ju
    Seminowicz, David A.
    Schabrun, Siobhan M.
    ELIFE, 2023, 12
  • [9] Probing regional cortical excitability via input-output properties using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography coupling
    Raffin, Estelle
    Harquel, Sylvain
    Passera, Brice
    Chauvin, Alan
    Bougerol, Thierry
    David, Olivier
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2020, 41 (10) : 2741 - 2761
  • [10] Excitation threshold of the motor cortex estimated with transcranial magnetic stimulation electroencephalography
    Komssi, Soile
    Savolainen, Petri
    Heiskala, Juha
    Kahkonen, Seppo
    NEUROREPORT, 2007, 18 (01) : 13 - 16