Incorporating variable RBE in IMPT optimization for ependymoma

被引:3
|
作者
Goudarzi, Hadis Moazami [1 ]
Lim, Gino [1 ]
Grosshans, David [2 ]
Mohan, Radhe [3 ]
Cao, Wenhua [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Dept Ind Engn, Houston, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77578 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 25卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ependymoma; IMPT; LET; optimization; RBE; RELATIVE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS; LINEAR-ENERGY-TRANSFER; MODULATED PROTON THERAPY; BRAIN NECROSIS; MODEL; RADIOTHERAPY; VALUES; ORGANS; POINT;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14207
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo study the dosimetric impact of incorporating variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons in optimizing intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment plans and to compare it with conventional constant RBE optimization and linear energy transfer (LET)-based optimization.MethodsThis study included 10 pediatric ependymoma patients with challenging anatomical features for treatment planning. Four plans were generated for each patient according to different optimization strategies: (1) constant RBE optimization (ConstRBEopt) considering standard-of-care dose requirements; (2) LET optimization (LETopt) using a composite cost function simultaneously optimizing dose-averaged LET (LETd) and dose; (3) variable RBE optimization (VarRBEopt) using a recent phenomenological RBE model developed by McNamara et al.; and (4) hybrid RBE optimization (hRBEopt) assuming constant RBE for the target and variable RBE for organs at risk. By normalizing each plan to obtain the same target coverage in either constant or variable RBE, we compared dose, LETd, LET-weighted dose, and equivalent uniform dose between the different optimization approaches.ResultsWe found that the LETopt plans consistently achieved increased LET in tumor targets and similar or decreased LET in critical organs compared to other plans. On average, the VarRBEopt plans achieved lower mean and maximum doses with both constant and variable RBE in the brainstem and spinal cord for all 10 patients. To compensate for the underdosing of targets with 1.1 RBE for the VarRBEopt plans, the hRBEopt plans achieved higher physical dose in targets and reduced mean and especially maximum variable RBE doses compared to the ConstRBEopt and LETopt plans.ConclusionWe demonstrated the feasibility of directly incorporating variable RBE models in IMPT optimization. A hybrid RBE optimization strategy showed potential for clinical implementation by maintaining all current dose limits and reducing the incidence of high RBE in critical normal tissues in ependymoma patients.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Equivalence and Differences Between Robust Optimization Methods and PTV Based Optimization Method for IMRT and IMPT
    Ge, S.
    Quan, M.
    Zhang, L.
    Liu, W.
    Mohan, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [32] A unified path seeking algorithm for IMRT and IMPT beam orientation optimization
    Ramesh, Pavitra
    Valdes, Gilmer
    O'Connor, Daniel
    Sheng, Ke
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (19)
  • [33] How can we consider variable RBE and LETd prediction during clinical practice? A pediatric case report at the Normandy Proton Therapy Centre using an independent dose engine
    Mein, Stewart
    Kopp, Benedikt
    Vela, Anthony
    Dutheil, Pauline
    Lesueur, Paul
    Stefan, Dinu
    Debus, Jurgen
    Haberer, Thomas
    Abdollahi, Amir
    Mairani, Andrea
    Tessonnier, Thomas
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [34] Variable RBE in proton radiotherapy: a comparative study with the predictive Mayo Clinic Florida microdosimetric kinetic model and phenomenological models of cell survival
    Parisi, Alessio
    Beltran, Chris J.
    Furutani, Keith M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (18)
  • [35] Robust optimization in IMPT using quadratic objective functions to account for the minimum MU constraint
    Shan, Jie
    An, Yu
    Bues, Martin
    Schild, Steven E.
    Liu, Wei
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (01) : 460 - 469
  • [36] Comparison of Proton Versus Photon SBRT for Treatment of Spinal Metastases Using Variable RBE Models
    Shaaban, Sherif G.
    Lecompte, Michael
    Chen, Hao
    Lubelski, Daniel
    Bydon, Ali
    Theodore, Nicholas
    Khan, Majid
    Lee, Sang
    Kebaish, Khaled
    Kleinberg, Lawrence
    Hooker, Ted
    Li, Heng
    Redmond, Kristin J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2025, 16
  • [37] A study to determine the impact of IMPT optimization techniques on prostate synthetic CT image sets dose comparison against CT image sets
    Anto, Gipson Joe
    Sekaran, Sureka
    Perumal, Bojarajan
    Ramar, Natarajan
    Vaitheeswaran, R.
    Karthikeyan, S. K.
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2022, 27 (01) : 161 - 169
  • [38] Robust optimization vs. stochastic programming incorporating risk measures for unit commitment with uncertain variable renewable generation
    Kazemzadeh, Narges
    Ryan, Sarah M.
    Hamzeei, Mahdi
    ENERGY SYSTEMS-OPTIMIZATION MODELING SIMULATION AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS, 2019, 10 (03): : 517 - 541
  • [39] Incorporating water quality responses into the framework of best management practices optimization
    Chen, Lei
    Wei, Guoyuan
    Shen, Zhenyao
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 541 : 1363 - 1374
  • [40] Hybrid Optimization of Controller for Multi-variable System
    Nagarajapandian, M.
    Kanthalakshmi, S.
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 19 (03) : 1733 - 1745