Incorporating variable RBE in IMPT optimization for ependymoma

被引:3
|
作者
Goudarzi, Hadis Moazami [1 ]
Lim, Gino [1 ]
Grosshans, David [2 ]
Mohan, Radhe [3 ]
Cao, Wenhua [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Dept Ind Engn, Houston, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77578 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 25卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ependymoma; IMPT; LET; optimization; RBE; RELATIVE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS; LINEAR-ENERGY-TRANSFER; MODULATED PROTON THERAPY; BRAIN NECROSIS; MODEL; RADIOTHERAPY; VALUES; ORGANS; POINT;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14207
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo study the dosimetric impact of incorporating variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons in optimizing intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment plans and to compare it with conventional constant RBE optimization and linear energy transfer (LET)-based optimization.MethodsThis study included 10 pediatric ependymoma patients with challenging anatomical features for treatment planning. Four plans were generated for each patient according to different optimization strategies: (1) constant RBE optimization (ConstRBEopt) considering standard-of-care dose requirements; (2) LET optimization (LETopt) using a composite cost function simultaneously optimizing dose-averaged LET (LETd) and dose; (3) variable RBE optimization (VarRBEopt) using a recent phenomenological RBE model developed by McNamara et al.; and (4) hybrid RBE optimization (hRBEopt) assuming constant RBE for the target and variable RBE for organs at risk. By normalizing each plan to obtain the same target coverage in either constant or variable RBE, we compared dose, LETd, LET-weighted dose, and equivalent uniform dose between the different optimization approaches.ResultsWe found that the LETopt plans consistently achieved increased LET in tumor targets and similar or decreased LET in critical organs compared to other plans. On average, the VarRBEopt plans achieved lower mean and maximum doses with both constant and variable RBE in the brainstem and spinal cord for all 10 patients. To compensate for the underdosing of targets with 1.1 RBE for the VarRBEopt plans, the hRBEopt plans achieved higher physical dose in targets and reduced mean and especially maximum variable RBE doses compared to the ConstRBEopt and LETopt plans.ConclusionWe demonstrated the feasibility of directly incorporating variable RBE models in IMPT optimization. A hybrid RBE optimization strategy showed potential for clinical implementation by maintaining all current dose limits and reducing the incidence of high RBE in critical normal tissues in ependymoma patients.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reformulated McNamara RBE-weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity modulated proton therapy
    Ramesh, Pavitra
    Lyu, Qihui
    Gu, Wenbo
    Ruan, Dan
    Sheng, Ke
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (04) : 2136 - 2149
  • [22] A systematic review of clinical studies on variable proton Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE)
    Underwood, Tracy S. A.
    McNamara, Aimee L.
    Appelt, Ane
    Haviland, Joanne S.
    Sorensen, Brita Singers
    Troost, Esther G. C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 175 : 79 - 92
  • [23] Hypoxia-informed RBE-weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity modulated proton therapy
    Ramesh, Pavitra
    Ruan, Dan
    Liu, S. John
    Seo, Youngho
    Braunstein, Steve
    Sheng, Ke
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (03) : 2320 - 2333
  • [24] Difference in LET-based biological doses between IMPT optimization techniques: Robust and PTV-based optimizations
    Hirayama, Shusuke
    Matsuura, Taeko
    Yasuda, Koichi
    Takao, Seishin
    Fujii, Takaaki
    Miyamoto, Naoki
    Umegaki, Kikuo
    Shimizu, Shinichi
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (04): : 42 - 50
  • [25] Does variable RBE affect toxicity risks for mediastinal lymphoma patients? NTCP-based evaluation after proton therapy treatment
    Tommasino, Francesco
    Cartechini, Giorgio
    Righetto, Roberto
    Farace, Paolo
    Cianchetti, Marco
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 108
  • [26] Investigating the Implications of a Variable RBE on Proton Dose Fractionation Across a Clinical Pencil Beam Scanned Spread-Out Bragg Peak
    Marshall, Thomas I.
    Chaudhary, Pankaj
    Michaelidesova, Anna
    Vachelova, Jana
    Davidkova, Marie
    Vondracek, Vladimir
    Schettino, Giuseppe
    Prise, Kevin M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01): : 70 - 77
  • [27] An Evaluation of Three Robust Optimization Approaches in IMPT Treatment Planning
    Cao, W.
    Zaqhian, M.
    Liu, W.
    Kardar, L.
    Randeniya, S.
    Urn, G.
    Mohan, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 552 - 552
  • [28] Variable RBE in proton therapy: comparison of different model predictions and their influence on clinical-like scenarios
    Giovannini, Giulia
    Boehlen, Till
    Cabal, Gonzalo
    Bauer, Julia
    Tessonnier, Thomas
    Frey, Kathrin
    Debus, Juergen
    Mairani, Andrea
    Parodi, Katia
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 11
  • [29] Combined RBE and OER optimization in proton therapy with FLUKA based on EF5-PET
    Henjum, Helge
    Dahle, Tordis Johnsen
    Mairani, Andrea
    Pilskog, Sara
    Stokkevag, Camilla
    Boer, Camilla Grindeland
    Redalen, Kathrine Roe
    Minn, Heikki
    Malinen, Eirik
    Ytre-Hauge, Kristian Smeland
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (09):
  • [30] Algorithms for the optimization of RBE-weighted dose in particle therapy
    Horcicka, M.
    Meyer, C.
    Buschbacher, A.
    Durante, M.
    Kraemer, M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (02) : 275 - 286