Group Prenatal Care vs. Traditional Prenatal Care: A Parity-Matched Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes in a Rural Community

被引:3
作者
Jones, Talitha H. [1 ]
Crump, William J. [1 ]
Foster, Shannon M. [2 ]
Mullins, Samantha J. [2 ]
Farris, Alicia N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Baptist Hlth Madisonville, Trover Campus,200 Clin Dr, 3rd North, Madisonville, KY 42431 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee Nashville Family Med Residency, 1020 N Highland Ave Murfreesboro, Murfreesboro, TN 37130 USA
[3] Mem Hlth Obstet & Gynecol Residency, 4700 Waters Ave, Savannah, GA 31404 USA
关键词
Traditional prenatal care; Group prenatal care; Rural health care; Perinatal outcomes; PRETERM BIRTH; WEIGHT; TRIAL; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-023-03600-z
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
SignificanceWe provide a comprehensive table comparingprevious studies of group care with a focus on differences in the populationsstudied. Ours is the first to provide perinatal outcomes from a ruralpopulation in the US and only the second to match for parity, a keypredictor. Our groups were smaller than previous reports, but our completematching on parity and contemporaneous delivery of the control group are strengths. We found no difference intraditional perinatal outcome, but group care patients reported higher rates ofbreastfeeding and not smoking, a difference only found in two previousurban-based reports. PurposePrenatal care is important for positive outcomes for both mother and infant. The traditional one-on-one method remains the most common. This study aimed to compare perinatal outcomes of patients attending group prenatal care with traditional prenatal care. Most previously published comparisons did not match for parity, a key predictor of perinatal outcome.DescriptionWe collected perinatal outcome data for 137group prenatal care patients and 137 traditional prenatal care patients,matched for contemporaneous delivery and parity, who delivered at our smallrural hospital during 2015-2016. We included key public health variables,including the initiation of breastfeeding, and smoking at the time of delivery.AssessmentThere was no difference between the two groups for maternal age or infant ethnicity, induced or augmented labor, preterm deliveries, APGAR scores less than 7, low birth weight, NICU admissions, or cesarean deliveries. Group care patients had more prenatal visits and were more likely to initiate breastfeeding and were less likely to report smoking at the time of delivery.ConclusionIn our rural population matched for contemporaneous delivery and parity, we found no difference in traditional perinatal outcome measures and that group care was positively associated with the key public health variables of not smoking and initiating breastfeeding. If future studies in other populations have similar findings, it may be wise to provide group care more widely to rural populations.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 581
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] THE ROLE OF PRENATAL-CARE IN PREVENTING LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT
    ALEXANDER, GR
    KORENBROT, CC
    [J]. FUTURE OF CHILDREN, 1995, 5 (01) : 103 - 120
  • [2] Group Prenatal Care
    McCue, Brigid K.
    Borders, Ann E.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 (03) : E104 - E108
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: A report of the Surgeon General
  • [4] Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education
    Benediktsson, Ingunn
    McDonald, Sheila W.
    Vekved, Monica
    McNeil, Deborah A.
    Dolan, Siobhan M.
    Tough, Suzanne C.
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2013, 13
  • [5] Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Carter, Ebony B.
    Temming, Lorene A.
    Akin, Jennifer
    Fowler, Susan
    Macones, George A.
    Colditz, Graham A.
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 128 (03) : 551 - 561
  • [6] Group versus traditional prenatal care: a retrospective cohort study
    Carter, Ebony B.
    Akin, Jennifer
    Barbier, Kate
    Sarabia, Rebecca
    Macones, George A.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (01) : S161 - S161
  • [7] Promoting improved social support and quality of life with the CenteringPregnancy® group model of prenatal care
    Chae, Sung Y.
    Chae, Mark H.
    Kandula, Sridevi
    Winter, Robin O.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF WOMENS MENTAL HEALTH, 2017, 20 (01) : 209 - 220
  • [8] Group Prenatal Care Reduces Risk of Preterm Birth and Low Birth Weight: A Matched Cohort Study
    Cunningham, Shayna D.
    Lewis, Jessica B.
    Shebl, Fatma M.
    Boyd, Lisa M.
    Robinson, Marc A.
    Grilo, Stephanie A.
    Lewis, Susan M.
    Pruett, Anne L.
    Ickovics, Jeannette R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2019, 28 (01) : 17 - 22
  • [9] IMPROVING PRENATAL CARE FOR MINORITY WOMEN
    Gennaro, Susan
    Melnyk, Bernadette Mazurek
    O'Connor, Caitlin
    Gibeau, Anne M.
    Nadel, Ellen
    [J]. MCN-THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-CHILD NURSING, 2016, 41 (03) : 147 - 153
  • [10] Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes - A randomized controlled trial
    Ickovics, Jeannette R.
    Kershaw, Trace S.
    Westdahl, Claire
    Magriples, Urania
    Massey, Zohar
    Reynolds, Heather
    Rising, Sharon Schindler
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 110 (02) : 330 - 339