Analysis of European competitiveness based on its innovative capacity and digitalization level

被引:30
作者
Marti, Luisa [1 ,2 ]
Puertas, Rosa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, Grp Int Econ & Dev, Camino Vera S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Valencia, Dept Econ & Ciencias Sociales, Valencia, Spain
关键词
Digitalization; Innovation; European Union; Synthetic indicator; Panel data; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMY; EMPLOYMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102206
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
The competitiveness of countries can be measured through their innovative capacity and the level of digitali-zation they have achieved. Technological advances have proven to be an engine of economic growth, promoting employment and sustainable development. In Europe, policies are being focused on investments to make this the "Digital Decade". Against this backdrop, the aim of the study is to analyse the competitiveness of the 27 countries of the European Union by producing a synthetic indicator that includes factors relating to innovation (measured by the Global Innovation Index) and to digitalization (based on the Digital Economy and Society Index), which in turn yields an annual ranking of the analysed economies between 2017 and 2021. Furthermore, in a second stage of the analysis, three panel data models are estimated to determine how factors relating to economic, social and environmental development foster advances in technology and innovation. The multicriteria decision-making method Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is applied to establish a ranking of EU members according to their level of digitalization and innovation, while the Prais-Winsten regression with Panel Corrected Standard Errors is used to obtain robust estimators. The results of the ranking indicate that the countries hold similar positions in the five years analysed, with Sweden leading the way throughout, which reflects its stable development in terms of digitalization and innovation. A digital and innovation gap can be seen between the top and bottom positions of the ranking, that is, between north-central and south-eastern Europe. Finally, the estimated models suggest that governments should promote wealth, employment, research and infrastructure investments in order to improve innovative and technological devel-opment in their countries.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Measuring the Information Society 2010: The ICT Development Index
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, OSL MAN GUID COLL IN, V3rd
[3]   Global innovation efficiency assessment of EU member and candidate countries via DEA-EATWIOS multi-criteria methodology [J].
Aytekin, Ahmet ;
Ecer, Fatih ;
Korucuk, Selcuk ;
Karamasa, Caglar .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2022, 68
[4]   How does the digital economy and society index (DESI) affect labor market indicators in EU countries? [J].
Basol, Oguz ;
Yalcin, Esin Cumhur .
HUMAN SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 2021, 40 (04) :503-512
[5]   Identifying diverse paths toward successful policy performance in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and European Union countries: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) exploitation of the sustainable governance indicators data(sic)(sic)(sic)Palabras clave [J].
Bazzan, Giulia ;
Alamos-Concha, Priscilla ;
Rihoux, Benoit .
EUROPEAN POLICY ANALYSIS, 2022, 8 (02) :178-208
[6]  
BECK N, 1995, AM POLIT SCI REV, V89, P634, DOI 10.2307/2082979
[7]   Assessing the level of digitalization and robotization in the enterprises of the European Union Member States [J].
Brodny, Jaroslaw ;
Tutak, Magdalena .
PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (07)
[8]   Digital Leadership in the Economies of the G20 Countries: A Secondary Research [J].
Cahyadi, Afriyadi ;
Magda, Robert .
ECONOMIES, 2021, 9 (01)
[9]  
Calvino F., 2018, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, DOI DOI 10.1787/F404736A-EN
[10]   Digital Government and Sustainable Development [J].
Castro, Conceicao ;
Lopes, Cristina .
JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2022, 13 (02) :880-903