Do speech-language therapists support young people with communication disability to use social media? A mixed methods study of professional practices

被引:4
作者
Shelton, Nichola [1 ,3 ]
Munro, Natalie [1 ]
Keep, Melanie [1 ]
Starling, Julia [1 ]
Tieu, Lyn [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Toronto, Fac Arts & Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Sydney, Level 6,Susan Wakil Hlth Bldg,D18 Western Ave, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
social media; adolescents; communication disability; mixed methods; professional practice; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; ADOLESCENTS; GUIDELINES; NETWORKING;
D O I
10.1111/1460-6984.12826
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
BackgroundSocial media is increasingly used by young people, including those with communication disability. To date, though, little is known about how speech-language therapists (SLTs) support the social media use of young people with communication disability. AimsTo explore what services SLTs provide to facilitate the social media use of young people with communication disability, including what these services look like, and the factors that impact SLTs' professional practices. Methods & ProceduresA sequential mixed methods approach was employed including an online survey and in-depth semi-structured interviews. Participants were qualified practising SLTs in Australia with a caseload that included clients aged 12-16 years. Quantitative data were analysed with SPSS. A thematic analysis of qualitative data was conducted with NVivo. Outcomes & ResultsSurvey responses from 61 SLTs were analysed. Interviews were conducted with 16 participants. Survey data indicated that SLTs do not systematically assess or treat young people's use of social media as part of their professional practice. Interview data revealed that where SLTs do support young people's use of social media, they transfer knowledge and practices typically used in offline contexts to underpin their work supporting clients' use of social media. In terms of factors that affect SLTs' practices, three major themes were identified: client/family factors, SLT factors, and societal factors. Conclusions & ImplicationsWhile young people with communication disability may desire digital participation in social media spaces, SLTs' current professional practices do not routinely address this need. Professional practice guidelines would support SLTs' practices in this area. Future research should seek the opinions of young people with communication disability regarding their use of social media, and the role of SLTs in facilitating this. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDSWhat is already known on the subjectYoung people with communication disability use social media, but digital inequality means that they may not do so to the same extent as their typically developing peers. Services targeting a young person's social media use is within the SLT scope of practice. Whether or not SLTs routinely address the social media use of young people with communication disability as part of their professional practice is unknown. What this study adds to existing knowledgeThis study found that SLTs in Australia do not systematically provide professional services targeting young people's use of social media. When services do address a young person's use of social media, knowledge and practices typically used by SLTs in offline contexts are adapted to support their work targeting online social media contexts. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?This study indicates that SLTs should consider a range of factors when deciding whether to address a young person's social media use. Adapting existing offline professional practices to online environments could support SLTs' work in providing services targeting social media use. Professional practice guidelines would support SLTs' work facilitating the social media use of young people with communication disability.
引用
收藏
页码:848 / 863
页数:16
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Twenty-Five Years of Social Media: A Review of Social Media Applications and Definitions from 1994 to 2019 [J].
Aichner, Thomas ;
Gruenfelder, Matthias ;
Maurer, Oswin ;
Jegeni, Deni .
CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING, 2021, 24 (04) :215-222
[2]   Media, information communication technologies, and youth literacies - A cultural studies perspective [J].
Alvermann, DE .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2004, 48 (01) :78-83
[3]  
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2016, SCOP PRACT SPEECH LA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Diffusion of innovation
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, GUID DEV IMPL EV CLI
[6]  
Australian Communications and Media Authority, 2021, KIDS MOB AUSTR CHILD
[7]   Social Media and Web Presence for Patients and Professionals: Evolving Trends and Implications for Practice [J].
Barreto, Jose E. ;
Whitehair, Curtis L. .
PM&R, 2017, 9 (05) :S98-S105
[8]   Informing design of an app-based coaching intervention to promote social participation of teenagers with traumatic brain injury [J].
Bedell, Gary M. ;
Wade, Shari L. ;
Turkstra, Lyn S. ;
Haarbauer-Krupa, Juliet ;
King, Jessica A. .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROREHABILITATION, 2017, 20 (07) :408-417
[9]   The Relationship of Loneliness and Social Anxiety with Children's and Adolescents' Online Communication [J].
Bonetti, Luigi ;
Campbell, Marilyn Anne ;
Gilmore, Linda .
CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING, 2010, 13 (03) :279-285
[10]   One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) :328-352