Supports and constraints to middle leadership development in higher education: A Q-methodology study

被引:8
作者
Chaaban, Youmen [1 ]
Qadhi, Saba [2 ,3 ]
Al-Thani, Hessa [4 ]
Floyd, Alan [5 ]
Du, Xiangyun [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Qatar Univ, Coll Educ, Educ Res Ctr, POB 2713,Al Jamiaa St, Doha, Qatar
[2] Qatar Univ, Common Core Program, Doha, Qatar
[3] Qatar Univ, Coll Educ, Doha, Qatar
[4] Qatar Univ, Coll Educ, Educ Sci, Doha, Qatar
[5] Univ Reading, Educ Leadership & Management, Reading, England
[6] Aalborg Univ, UNESCO Ctr Problem & Project Based Learning, Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Middle leadership development; higher education; complexity thinking; Q methodology; Qatar; DISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIP; UNIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1177/17411432231174092
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Middle leadership development in a Higher Education context can be understood as a complex endeavor, influenced by interactions and interrelations within multiple systems. We explored the perspectives of thirty-five male and female middle leaders on the conditions influencing their leadership development at one university in Qatar. Q methodology was applied to collect and analyze data quantitatively and qualitatively. A 40-statement Q-sample was developed based on a proposed conceptual framework inspired by complexity thinking, and consisting of three dimensions; intrapersonal, relational, and institutional. Q factor analysis revealed four significantly different viewpoints regarding the conditions that participants perceived were most influential for their leadership development, namely (1) institutional goals, (2) a culture of trust, (3) senior leadership support, and (4) personal ambitions. Despite the differences in viewpoints, three common constraints to leadership development were also identified. The study has implications for middle leadership development, with its distinctive methodological, theoretical, and contextual contributions.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 680
页数:22
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Leadership development in academia in the UAE: creating a community of learning [J].
Abdulla, Ayesha ;
Fenech, Roberta ;
Kinsella, Katrina ;
Hiasat, Lana ;
Chakravarti, Sriya ;
White, Timothy ;
Rajan, Panthayil Babu .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 45 (01) :96-112
[2]   "New managerialism" in higher education: the case of United Arab Emirates [J].
Ajayan, Shalini ;
Balasubramanian, Sreejith .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 22 (02) :147-168
[3]   Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building [J].
Avolio, Bruce J. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2007, 62 (01) :25-33
[4]  
Banasick S, 2019, J OPEN SOURCE SOFTW, V4, P1360, DOI [10.21105/joss.01360, 10.21105/joss.01360, DOI 10.21105/JOSS.01360]
[5]   Distributed Leadership in Organizations: A Review of Theory and Research [J].
Bolden, Richard .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2011, 13 (03) :251-269
[6]   Middle leadership in higher education: A relational analysis [J].
Branson, Christopher M. ;
Franken, Margaret ;
Penney, Dawn .
EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION & LEADERSHIP, 2016, 44 (01) :128-145
[7]   Effective leadership in higher education: a literature review [J].
Bryman, Alan .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2007, 32 (06) :693-710
[8]   Learning to lead: a discussion of development programs for academic leadership capability in Australian Universities [J].
Butler, Jane .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 42 (04) :424-437
[9]   A systems-thinking approach to evaluating a university professional development programme [J].
Chaaban, Youmen ;
Al-Thani, Hessa ;
Du, Xiangyun .
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN EDUCATION, 2024, 50 (02) :296-314
[10]   Model of complexity leadership development [J].
Clarke, Nicholas .
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 16 (02) :135-150