An integrative approach to medical laboratory equipment risk management

被引:2
作者
Saleh, Neven [1 ,2 ]
Gamal, Omnia [3 ]
Eldosoky, Mohamed A. A. [3 ]
Shaaban, Abdel Rahman [2 ]
机构
[1] October Univ Modern Sci & Arts MSA, Fac Engn, Elect Commun & Elect Syst Engn Dept, 6th October City, Giza, Egypt
[2] Shorouk Acad, Syst & Biomed Engn Dept, Higher Inst Engn, Al Shorouk City, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Helwan Univ, Fac Engn, Biomed Engn Dept, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Risk management; FMEA; TOPSIS; Machine learning; Medical laboratory; Multi-criteria decision-making; DECISION-MAKING; TOPSIS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-54334-z
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Medical Laboratory Equipment (MLE) is one of the most influential means for diagnosing a patient in healthcare facilities. The accuracy and dependability of clinical laboratory testing is essential for making disease diagnosis. A risk-reduction plan for managing MLE is presented in the study. The methodology was initially based on the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method. Because of the drawbacks of standard FMEA implementation, a Technique for Ordering Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was adopted in addition to the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. Each piece of MLE under investigation was given a risk priority number (RPN), which in turn assigned its risk level. The equipment performance can be improved, and maintenance work can be prioritized using the generated RPN values. Moreover, five machine learning classifiers were employed to classify TOPSIS results for appropriate decision-making. The current study was conducted on 15 various hospitals in Egypt, utilizing a 150 MLE set of data from an actual laboratory, considering three different types of MLE. By applying the TOPSIS and SAW methods, new RPN values were obtained to rank the MLE risk. Because of its stability in ranking the MLE risk value compared to the conventional FMEA and SAW methods, the TOPSIS approach has been accepted. Thus, a prioritized list of MLEs was identified to make decisions related to appropriate incoming maintenance and scrapping strategies according to the guidance of machine learning classifiers.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Hospital site selection with distance-based multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Adali, Esra Aytac
    Tus, Aysegul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 14 (02) : 534 - 544
  • [2] Azadi Parand Fereshteh, 2021, J Biomed Phys Eng, V11, P621, DOI 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1133
  • [3] Bastawi AM., 2020, J. Clin. Eng, V45, P123, DOI [10.1097/JCE.0000000000000399, DOI 10.1097/JCE.0000000000000399]
  • [4] A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications
    Behzadian, Majid
    Otaghsara, S. Khanmohammadi
    Yazdani, Morteza
    Ignatius, Joshua
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (17) : 13051 - 13069
  • [5] Synthetic evaluation of the effect of health promotion: Impact of a UNICEF project in 40 poor western counties of China
    Bi, Y.
    Lai, D.
    Yan, H.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 124 (07) : 376 - 391
  • [6] Chakraborty S., 2022, DECISION ANALYTICS J, V2, P100021, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.DAJOUR.2021.100021
  • [7] Deng entropy
    Deng, Yong
    [J]. CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2016, 91 : 549 - 553
  • [8] Gaber M. N., 2020, 2020 12 INT C ELECT
  • [9] Automated Risk Control in Medical Imaging Equipment Management Using Cloud Application
    Ghanem, Sally M.
    Wahed, Manal Abdel
    Saleh, Neven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING, 2018, 2018
  • [10] SIM-PFED: A Simulation-Based Decision Making Model of Patient Flow for Improving Patient Throughput Time in Emergency Department
    Hamza, Nidal
    Majid, Mazlina Abdul
    Hujainah, Fadhl
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 103419 - 103439