Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression: A Narrative Review

被引:5
作者
Yuan, Hongjie [1 ]
Yi, Xiaobin [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Xinhua Hosp, Dept Pain Med, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Washington Univ St Louis, Dept Anesthesiol, Pain Div, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
lumbar spinal stenosis; minimally invasive lumbar decompression; mild (R); low back pain; lumbar radiculopathy; neurogenic claudication; ligamentum flavum; INTERVERTEBRAL FORAMEN; RADIOLOGIC CRITERIA; FLEXION-EXTENSION; SINGLE-CENTER; MILD(R); DIAGNOSIS; CLAUDICATION; COMPRESSION; LAMINECTOMY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.2147/JPR.S428112
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common pain condition that causes lumbar back pain, radiating leg pain, and possible functional impairment. MILD is an emerging minimally invasive treatment for LSS. It is an image-guided percutaneous procedure designed to debulk hypertrophied ligamentum flavum. However, the exact short-and long-term efficacy, safety profile, indication criteria, and certain procedure details reported in medical literature vary.Objective: This narrative review was to elucidate efficacy, safety profile, certain procedure details, advantages, and limitations of MILD.Study Design: This is a narrative review.Setting: All included articles are clinic trials including analytic studies and descriptive studies.Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched. Only clinical trials of MILD procedure were included. Information of indications, contraindications, VAS scores, ODI scores, effective rate, efficacy durations, and certain procedure details was focused on. Results: According to the literature, for the MILD procedure, the VAS score could be reduced from a pre-treatment level of 6.3-9.6 to a post-treatment level of 2.3-5.8. The ODI score could be reduced from a pre-treatment level of 38.8-55.3 to a post-treatment level of 27.4-39.8. The effective rate of the MILD procedure was reported to be 57.1%-88%. A 2-year postoperative stability of efficacy was also supported. One RCT study testified superior efficacy of MILD over epidural steroid injection.Limitations: There is few high-quality literature in the review. Moreover, the long-term efficacy of MILD cannot be revealed according to the current literature.Conclusion: Based on the reviewed literature, MILD is an effective and safe procedure. MILD can reduce pain intensity and improve functional status significantly. Therefore, it is a preferable option for LSS patients who failed conservative treatments, but not for those who require immediate invasive decompression surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:3707 / 3724
页数:18
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   A Systematic Review of Semiquantitative and Qualitative Radiologic Criteria for the Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [J].
Andreisek, Gustav ;
Imhof, Mario ;
Wertli, Maria ;
Winklhofer, Sebastian ;
Pfirrmann, Christian W. A. ;
Hodler, Juerg ;
Steurer, Johann .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (05) :W735-W746
[2]   Mild Procedure Single-site Prospective IRB Study [J].
Basu, Sanghamitra .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 28 (03) :254-258
[3]  
Benyamin RM, 2016, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V19, P229
[4]   A Double-blind, Randomized, Prospective Study of Epidural Steroid Injection vs. The mild® Procedure in Patients with Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [J].
Brown, Lora L. .
PAIN PRACTICE, 2012, 12 (05) :333-341
[5]   Non-Surgical Interventions for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Leading To Neurogenic Claudication: A Clinical Practice Guideline [J].
Bussieres, Andre ;
Cancelliere, Carolina ;
Ammendolia, Carlo ;
Comer, Christine M. ;
Al Zoubi, Fadi ;
Chatillon, Claude-Edouard ;
Chernish, Greg ;
Cox, James M. ;
Gliedt, Jordan A. ;
Haskett, Danielle ;
Jensen, Rikke Kruger ;
Marchand, Andree-Anne ;
Tomkins-Lane, Christy ;
O'Shaughnessy, Julie ;
Passmore, Steven ;
Schneider, Michael J. ;
Shipka, Peter ;
Stewart, Gregory ;
Stuber, Kent ;
Yee, Albert ;
Ornelas, Joseph .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2021, 22 (09) :1015-1039
[6]  
Chopko B, 2010, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V13, P369
[7]   Long-term Results of Percutaneous Lumbar Decompression for LSS Two-Year Outcomes [J].
Chopko, Bohdan W. .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2013, 29 (11) :939-943
[8]   A novel method for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in high-risk surgical candidates pilot study experience with percutaneous remodeling of ligamentum flavum and lamina Clinical article [J].
Chopko, Bohdan Wolodymyr .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2011, 14 (01) :46-50
[9]   Effect of low back posture on the morphology of the spinal canal [J].
Chung, SS ;
Lee, CS ;
Kim, SH ;
Chung, MW ;
Ahn, JM .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 29 (04) :217-223
[10]   Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Therapeutic Options Review [J].
Costandi, Shrif ;
Chopko, Bohdan ;
Mekhail, Mena ;
Dews, Teresa ;
Mekhail, Nagy .
PAIN PRACTICE, 2015, 15 (01) :68-81