Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer-Can it be trusted?

被引:0
|
作者
Ihnat, Peter [1 ]
Zidlik, Vladimir [2 ]
Rudinska, Lucia Ihnat [3 ]
Koscielnik, Pavel [4 ]
Hanzlikov, Pavla [4 ]
Skarda, Jozef [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ostrava, Dept Surg, 17listopadu 1790, Ostrava 70852, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Hosp Ostrava, Dept Pathol, 17listopadu 1790, Ostrava, Czech Republic
[3] Univ Hosp Ostrava, Dept Forens Med, 17listopadu 1790, Ostrava, Czech Republic
[4] Univ Hosp Ostrava, Dept Radiol, 17listopadu 1790, Ostrava, Czech Republic
[5] Univ Ostrava, Inst Mol & Clin Pathol & Med Genet, Fac Med, Syllabova 19, Ostrava 70300, Czech Republic
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Lymph nodes; Rectal cancer; Nodal assessment; Accuracy; Neoadjuvant radiotherapy; RADIOTHERAPY; RESECTION; ACCURACY; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110961
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic modality for the evaluation of primary rectal cancer, but MRI assessment of nodal involvement remains a confounding factor. Method: This prospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of preoperative MRI in the assessment of nodal status by comparing histopathology reports to MRI findings on a node-by-node basis in 69 patients with rectal cancer.Results: Primary surgery was performed in 40 (58.0%) patients; 29 (42.0%) study patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Histopathological examination revealed T1 tumour in 8 (11.6%) patients, T2 tumour in 30 (43.5%), and T3 tumour in 25 (36.2%). In total, 897 lymph nodes (LNs) have been harvested (13.1 & PLUSMN; 5.4 LNs per specimen). There were 77 MRI-suspicious LNs, 21 (27.3%) of which were histologically proven malignant. The sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2% and specificity 93.4%. Of the 28 patients with MRI-suspicious LNs the diagnosis was correct in 42.8%. The MRI accuracy was 33.3% in "primary surgery" subgroup (n = 18, malignant LNs found in 6 patients). Diagnosis of MRI-negative LNs was correct in 90.2% of study patients; malignant nodes were found in 9.8% of patients initially classified as cN0.Conclusions: MRI prediction of nodal status in patients with rectal cancer has very low accuracy. Decisions regarding neoadjuvant CRT should not be based on MRI assessment of nodal status, but on the MRI evaluation of tumour depth invasion (T stage and relationship between the tumour and mesorectal fascia).
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with pathological staging
    Faletti, Riccardo
    Gatti, Marco
    Arezzo, Alberto
    Stola, Silvia
    Benedini, Maria C.
    Bergamasco, Laura
    Morino, Mario
    Fonio, Paolo
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2018, 73 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [22] Rectal Cancer: MR imaging of the mesorectal fascia and effect of chemoradiation on assessment of tumor involvement
    Oberholzer, Katja
    Junginger, Theodor
    Heintz, Achim
    Kreft, Andreas
    Hansen, Torsten
    Lollert, Andre
    Ebert, Maren
    Dueber, Christoph
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 36 (03) : 658 - 663
  • [23] Imaging in Rectal Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Endorectal Ultrasonography
    Samdani, Tushar
    Garcia-Aguilar, Julio
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 23 (01) : 59 - +
  • [24] Correlation Between Endorectal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Predicting the Circumferential Resection Margin in Patients With Mid-Low Rectal Cancer Without Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Ye, Dalin
    Zhu, Zhimin
    Chen, Fei
    Lie, Chaowei
    Li, Wenlu
    Lin, Yunyong
    Qiu, Shaodong
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (03) : 569 - 577
  • [25] The impact of lymph node size to predict nodal metastasis in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy
    Kim, Im-kyung
    Kang, Jeonghyun
    Lim, Beom Jin
    Sohn, Seung-Kook
    Lee, Kang Young
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 30 (04) : 459 - 464
  • [26] Intra- and Interobserver Variability in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements in Rectal Cancer Patients
    Grimm, Peter
    Loft, Martina Kastrup
    Dam, Claus
    Pedersen, Malene Roland Vils
    Timm, Signe
    Rafaelsen, Soren Rafael
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (20)
  • [27] Is there a benefit in using magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer?
    Wu, Lian-Ming
    Zhu, Jiong
    Hu, Jiani
    Yin, Yan
    Gu, Hai-Yan
    Hua, Jia
    Chen, Jie
    Xu, Jian-Rong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 28 (09) : 1225 - 1238
  • [28] Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative setting for breast cancer patients with undetected additional disease
    Barco, Israel
    Chabrera, Carolina
    Garcia-Fernandez, Antonio
    Fraile, Manel
    Vidal, MCarmen
    Gonzalez, Sonia
    Maria Lain, Jose
    Rene, Assumpta
    Canales, Lidia
    Vallejoa, Elena
    Deu, Jordi
    Pessarrodona, Antoni
    Gimenez, Nuria
    Garcia-Font, Marc
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (10) : 1786 - 1793
  • [29] Deep transfer learning based on magnetic resonance imaging can improve the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer
    Li, Jin
    Zhou, Yang
    Wang, Peng
    Zhao, Henan
    Wang, Xinxin
    Tang, Na
    Luan, Kuan
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2021, 11 (06) : 2477 - 2485
  • [30] Factors Related to Preoperative Assessment of the Circumferential Resection Margin and the Extent of Mesorectal Invasion by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Comparison Study
    Young-Wan Kim
    Seung-Whan Cha
    Juyon Pyo
    Nam-Kyu Kim
    Byung-Soh Min
    Myeong-Jin Kim
    Hoguen Kim
    World Journal of Surgery, 2009, 33 : 1952 - 1960