Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer-Can it be trusted?

被引:0
|
作者
Ihnat, Peter [1 ]
Zidlik, Vladimir [2 ]
Rudinska, Lucia Ihnat [3 ]
Koscielnik, Pavel [4 ]
Hanzlikov, Pavla [4 ]
Skarda, Jozef [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ostrava, Dept Surg, 17listopadu 1790, Ostrava 70852, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Hosp Ostrava, Dept Pathol, 17listopadu 1790, Ostrava, Czech Republic
[3] Univ Hosp Ostrava, Dept Forens Med, 17listopadu 1790, Ostrava, Czech Republic
[4] Univ Hosp Ostrava, Dept Radiol, 17listopadu 1790, Ostrava, Czech Republic
[5] Univ Ostrava, Inst Mol & Clin Pathol & Med Genet, Fac Med, Syllabova 19, Ostrava 70300, Czech Republic
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Lymph nodes; Rectal cancer; Nodal assessment; Accuracy; Neoadjuvant radiotherapy; RADIOTHERAPY; RESECTION; ACCURACY; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110961
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic modality for the evaluation of primary rectal cancer, but MRI assessment of nodal involvement remains a confounding factor. Method: This prospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of preoperative MRI in the assessment of nodal status by comparing histopathology reports to MRI findings on a node-by-node basis in 69 patients with rectal cancer.Results: Primary surgery was performed in 40 (58.0%) patients; 29 (42.0%) study patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Histopathological examination revealed T1 tumour in 8 (11.6%) patients, T2 tumour in 30 (43.5%), and T3 tumour in 25 (36.2%). In total, 897 lymph nodes (LNs) have been harvested (13.1 & PLUSMN; 5.4 LNs per specimen). There were 77 MRI-suspicious LNs, 21 (27.3%) of which were histologically proven malignant. The sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2% and specificity 93.4%. Of the 28 patients with MRI-suspicious LNs the diagnosis was correct in 42.8%. The MRI accuracy was 33.3% in "primary surgery" subgroup (n = 18, malignant LNs found in 6 patients). Diagnosis of MRI-negative LNs was correct in 90.2% of study patients; malignant nodes were found in 9.8% of patients initially classified as cN0.Conclusions: MRI prediction of nodal status in patients with rectal cancer has very low accuracy. Decisions regarding neoadjuvant CRT should not be based on MRI assessment of nodal status, but on the MRI evaluation of tumour depth invasion (T stage and relationship between the tumour and mesorectal fascia).
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing Histopathological and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Mesorectal Fascia Status in Patients with Rectal Carcinoma
    Hassan, Usman
    Khan, Rizwanullah
    Mehmood, Muhammad Tariq
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2014, 24 (04): : 236 - 240
  • [2] Selection of Patients With Rectal Cancer for Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Are T Category and Nodal Status All That Matters?
    Pooni, Amandeep
    Al-Sukhni, Eisar
    Milot, Laurent
    Fruitman, Mark
    Victor, J. Charles
    Schmocker, Selina
    Brown, Gina
    Kennedy, Erin
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2019, 62 (04) : 447 - 453
  • [3] Impact of mesorectal extranodal tumor deposits in magnetic resonance imaging on outcome of rectal cancer patients
    Marjasuo, Suvi T.
    Lehtimaki, Tiina E.
    Koskenvuo, Laura E.
    Lepisto, Anna H.
    EJSO, 2024, 50 (06):
  • [4] The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Select Patients for Preoperative Treatment in Rectal Cancer
    Roedel, Claus
    Sauer, Rolf
    Fietkau, Rainer
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2009, 185 (08) : 488 - 492
  • [5] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Rectal and Anal Cancer
    Torkzad, Michael R.
    Kamel, Ihab
    Halappa, Vivek Gowdra
    Beets-Tan, Regina G. H.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 22 (01) : 85 - +
  • [6] Magnetic resonance imaging in restaging rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Zhan, Shufang
    Wang, Xingxing
    Huang, Xuefeng
    Zhu, Hongbo
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2015, 20 (01): : 62 - 67
  • [7] Significance of mesorectal volume in staging of rectal cancer with magnetic resonance imaging and the assessment of involvement of the mesorectal fascia
    Torkzad, Michael R.
    Hansson, Karl A.
    Lindholm, Johan
    Martling, Anna
    Blomqvist, Lennart
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (07) : 1694 - 1699
  • [8] Significance of mesorectal volume in staging of rectal cancer with magnetic resonance imaging and the assessment of involvement of the mesorectal fascia
    Michael R. Torkzad
    Karl A. Hansson
    Johan Lindholm
    Anna Martling
    Lennart Blomqvist
    European Radiology, 2007, 17
  • [9] Comparison of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging with postoperative pathology results in rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy
    Akgul, Ozgur
    Martli, Huseyin Fahri
    Goktas, Abidin
    Pak, Mehmet Ali
    Tez, Mesut
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 94 (06) : 1133 - 1137
  • [10] A preliminary study of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer: imaging quality and preoperative assessment
    Li Zhao
    Meng Liang
    Pu-yeh Wu
    Yang Yang
    Hongmei Zhang
    Xinming Zhao
    Insights into Imaging, 12