Natural Theology and Divine Freedom

被引：0

作者：

Kremers, Philipp ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Georgetown Univ, Dept Philosophy, 37th & O St NW, Washington, DC 20057 USA

来源：

SOPHIA | 2024年 / 63卷 / 01期

关键词：

Natural theology; Free will; Divine freedom; Heterodox conceptions of God; Spinoza; Avicenna; PHILOSOPHY;

D O I：

10.1007/s11841-023-00951-6

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

Many philosophers of theistic religions claim (1) that there are powerful a posteriori arguments for God's existence that make it rational to believe that He exists and at the same time maintain (2) that God always has the freedom to do otherwise. In this article, I argue that these two positions are inconsistent because the empirical evidence on which the a posteriori arguments for God's existence rest can be explained better by positing the existence of a God-like being without the freedom to do otherwise.

引用

页码：135 / 150

页数：16

共 28 条

[21] Schilbrack Kevin., 2014, PHILOS STUDY RELIG M
[22] Swinburne R., 2014, MIND BRAIN FREE WILL
[23] Swinburne R., 2005, Faith and Reason, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283927.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199283927.001.0001]
[24] Swinburne R., 2004, EXISTENCE GOD, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271672.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199271672.001.0001]
[25] Swinburne Richard., 1993, The Coherence of Theism, DOI DOI 10.1093/0198240708.001.0001
[26] Wielenberg E., 2021, THEOLOGICA, V5, P80
[27] Wolterstorff N., 1976, REASON BOUNDS RELIG
[28] Zagzebski L, 2000, NOUS, P231

← 1 2 3 →