SDG5 "Gender Equality" and the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid assessment of health system responses in selected upper-middle and high-income countries

被引:7
作者
Kuhlmann, Ellen [1 ]
Lotta, Gabriela [2 ,3 ]
Fernandez, Michelle [4 ]
Herten-Crabb, Asha [5 ]
Mac Fehr, Leonie [1 ]
Maple, Jaimie-Lee [6 ]
Paina, Ligia [7 ]
Wenham, Clare [5 ]
Willis, Karen [6 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Clin Rheumatol & Immunol, Hannover, Germany
[2] Getulio Vargas Fdn, Dept Publ Adm, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Ctr Metropolitan Studies, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Brasilia, Inst Polit Sci, Brasilia, Brazil
[5] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci LSE, Dept Hlth Policy, London, England
[6] Univ Victoria, Coll Hlth & Biomed, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
关键词
SDG5 gender equality; COVID-19; pandemic; health systems and policy; international comparison; upper-middle and high-income countries;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2023.1078008
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare and societies, exacerbating existing inequalities for women and girls across every sphere. Our study explores health system responses to gender equality goals during the COVID-19 pandemic and inclusion in future policies. MethodsWe apply a qualitative comparative approach, drawing on secondary sources and expert information; the data was collected from March-July 2022. Australia, Brazil, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the USA were selected, reflecting upper-middle and high-income countries with established public health and gender policies but different types of healthcare systems and epidemiological and geo-political conditions. Three sub-goals of SDG5 were analyzed: maternity care/reproductive health, gender-based violence, and gender equality/women's leadership. ResultsWe found similar trends across countries. Pandemic policies strongly cut into women's health, constrained prevention and support services, and weakened reproductive rights, while essential maternity care services were kept open. Intersecting gender inequalities were reinforced, sexual violence increased and women's leadership was weak. All healthcare systems failed to protect women's health and essential public health targets. Yet there were relevant differences in the responses to increased violence and reproductive rights, ranging from some support measures in Australia to an abortion ban in the US. ConclusionsOur study highlights a need for revising pandemic policies through a feminist lens.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: Evidence from real time surveys [J].
Adams-Prassl, Abi ;
Boneva, Teodora ;
Golin, Marta ;
Rauh, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2020, 189
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Ten Challenges for the UN in 2021-2022 Special Briefing N6
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Interim Technical Note
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Maternal Mortality Ratio (Modeled Estimate, per 100,000 Live Births) | Data
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2021, PAN EUROPEAN COMMISS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Salute e Societa, DOI DOI 10.3280/SES2009-EN2009
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Global Gender Gap Index
[8]  
[Anonymous], NEW YORK TIMES
[9]   The impact of COVID-19 on the provision of respectful maternity care: Findings from a global survey of health workers [J].
Asefa, Anteneh ;
Semaan, Aline ;
Delvaux, Therese ;
Huysmans, Elise ;
Galle, Anna ;
Sacks, Emma ;
Bohren, Meghan A. ;
Morgan, Alison ;
Sadler, Michelle ;
Vedam, Saraswathi ;
Benova, Lenka .
WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2022, 35 (04) :378-386
[10]   COVID-19 and the gender health paradox [J].
Bambra, Clare ;
Albani, Viviana ;
Franklin, Paula .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 49 (01) :17-26