Communication strategy use of EFL learners in videoconferencing, virtual world and face-to-face environments

被引:5
|
作者
Cirit-Isikligil, Nazli Ceren [1 ]
Sadler, Randall W. [2 ]
Arica-Akkok, Elif [3 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Univ Illinois, Linguist, Champaign, IL USA
[3] Ankara Univ, Linguist, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
communication strategy; computer-mediated communication; virtual world; videoconferencing; English as a foreign language;
D O I
10.1017/S0958344022000210
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigates the communication strategy (CS) use of English as a foreign language (EFL) learners in videoconferencing (VC), virtual world (VW), and face-to-face environments. The study was conducted with 30 senior Turkish undergraduate EFL students. The data were collected via video and audio recordings of three opinion-exchange tasks, a background and post-task questionnaire, and an interview that includes a retrospective think-aloud protocol. The participants worked in groups of five to complete the opinion-exchange tasks in each of the three environments. The findings indicated that the participants made use of a wide range of CSs, and although some of the CSs differed, mostly the same types were employed in all the environments. However, the results revealed that the frequency of CSs showed variance among environments, with the highest number in the VC environment and the lowest in the VW. It was possible to establish a connection between the differences in the frequency and the types of strategy use with the distinctive features of the environments, the proficiency level of the participants, and the type of the tasks that was utilized. Additively, 10 new strategy types were discovered.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 138
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Change to the Therapeutic Frame: Exploring the Therapeutic Alliance When Transitioning from Face-to-Face Therapy to Videoconferencing
    Anthony Shoullis
    Simone Mohi
    Elly Quinlan
    James Collison
    Georgia Braude
    International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 2023, 45 : 458 - 474
  • [22] Psychological Aspects of Face-To-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Interpersonal Communication: An Integrative Review
    Tsigeman, Elina
    Mararitsa, Larisa
    Gundelah, Olga
    Lopatina, Olga
    Koltsova, Olessia
    SOCIAL COMPUTING AND SOCIAL MEDIA, PT III, SCSM 2024, 2024, 14705 : 29 - 48
  • [23] The effect of explicit teaching of story structure on EFL learners' use of communication strategy
    Yazdanpanah, Zahra
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2012, 32 : 391 - 398
  • [24] Social identity cues to improve creativity and identification in face-to-face and virtual groups
    Guegan, Jerome
    Segonds, Frederic
    Barre, Jessy
    Maranzana, Nicolas
    Mantelet, Fabrice
    Buisine, Stephanie
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2017, 77 : 140 - 147
  • [25] Comparing Face-to-face Group Communication with Computer-mediated Group Communication With the Functional Perspective
    Su Qianqian
    Zheng Quanquan
    Lian Fengqin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PUBLIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2012, : 14 - 19
  • [26] Face-to-Face Versus Virtual Teams: What Have We Really Learned?
    Purvanova, Radostina K.
    PSYCHOLOGIST-MANAGER JOURNAL, 2014, 17 (01) : 2 - 29
  • [27] Communication, compassion, and computers: Adolescents' and adults' evaluations of online and face-to-face deception
    O'Rourke, Sean
    Eskritt, Michelle
    Bosacki, Sandra
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE, 2018, 65 : 133 - 140
  • [28] Cross-cultural deception in social networking sites and face-to-face communication
    Lewis, Carmen C.
    George, Joey F.
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2008, 24 (06) : 2945 - 2964
  • [29] Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in a primary school setting
    van der Meijden, H
    Veenman, S
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2005, 21 (05) : 831 - 859
  • [30] Computer-mediated and face-to-face communication in metastatic cancer support groups
    Vilhauer, Ruvanee P.
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2014, 12 (04) : 287 - 297