Ripple-Spreading Network of China's Systemic Financial Risk Contagion: New Evidence from the Regime-Switching Model

被引:0
作者
Zhang, Beibei [1 ]
Xie, Xuemei [1 ]
Zhou, Xi [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100876, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang A&F Univ, Jiyang Coll, Shaoxing 311800, Peoples R China
关键词
CONNECTEDNESS;
D O I
10.1155/2024/5316162
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
A better understanding of financial contagion and systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) is essential for the prevention and control of systemic financial risk. Considering the ripple effect of financial contagion, we integrate the relevant spatiotemporal information that affects financial contagion and propose to use the ripple-spreading network to simulate the dynamic process of risk contagion in China's financial system. In addition, we introduce the smooth-transition vector autoregression (STVAR) model to identify "high" and "low" systemic risk regimes and set the relevant parameters of the ripple-spreading network on this basis. The results show that risk ripples spread much faster in high than in low systemic risk regimes. However, systemic shocks can also trigger large-scale risk contagion in the financial system even in a low systemic risk regime as the risk ripple continues. In addition, whether the financial system is in a high or low systemic risk regime, the risk ripples from a contagion source (i.e., a real estate company) spread first to the real estate sector and the banking sector. The network centrality results of the heterogeneous ripple-spreading network indicate that most securities and banks and some real estate companies have the highest systemic importance, followed by the insurance, and finally the diversified financial institutions. Our study provides a new perspective on the regulatory practice of systemic financial risk and reminds regulators to focus not only on large institutions but also on institutions with strong ripple capacity.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Measuring Systemic Risk
    Acharya, Viral V.
    Pedersen, Lasse H.
    Philippon, Thomas
    Richardson, Matthew
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2017, 30 (01) : 2 - 47
  • [2] CoVaR
    Adrian, Tobias
    Brunnermeier, Markus K.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (07) : 1705 - 1741
  • [3] Multiresponse Optimization of Linkage Parameters of a Compliant Mechanism Using Hybrid Genetic Algorithm-Based Swarm Intelligence
    Alfattani, Rami
    Yunus, Mohammed
    Alamro, Turki
    Alnaser, Ibrahim A.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 2021
  • [4] Network analysis of global stock markets at the beginning of the coronavirus disease (Covid-19) outbreak
    Aslam, Faheem
    Mohmand, Yasir Tariq
    Ferreira, Paulo
    Memon, Bilal Ahmed
    Khan, Maaz
    Khan, Mrestyal
    [J]. BORSA ISTANBUL REVIEW, 2020, 20 : S49 - S61
  • [5] Back T., 1997, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, V1, P3, DOI 10.1109/4235.585888
  • [6] Asymmetric Network Connectedness of Fears
    Barunik, Jozef
    Bevilacqua, Mattia
    Tunaru, Radu
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2022, 104 (06) : 1304 - 1316
  • [7] Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors
    Billio, Monica
    Getmansky, Mila
    Lo, Andrew W.
    Pelizzon, Loriana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 104 (03) : 535 - 559
  • [8] Mining market data: A network approach
    Boginski, V
    Butenko, S
    Pardalos, PM
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2006, 33 (11) : 3171 - 3184
  • [9] Realized semibetas: Disentangling "good" and "bad" downside risks
    Bollerslev, Tim
    Patton, Andrew J.
    Quaedvlieg, Rogier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 144 (01) : 227 - 246
  • [10] Estimation and model-based combination of causality networks among large US banks and insurance companies
    Bonaccolto, Giovanni
    Caporin, Massimiliano
    Panzica, Roberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2019, 54 : 1 - 21