Institutional factors of international trade: A case of the European Union's Generalized System of Preferences and World Trade Organization

被引:0
作者
Miadokova, Nikola [1 ]
Rysova, Lucia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Matej Bel Bansk Bystrica, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia
来源
TERRA ECONOMICUS | 2023年 / 21卷 / 04期
关键词
international trade; European Union; World Trade Organization; institutional factors; generalized system of preferences; developing countries; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; INTEGRATION; AGREEMENTS;
D O I
10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-4-123-134
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
International trade, a cornerstone of global economic activity, is significantly influenced by institutional framework. This framework comprises a complex array of policies, agreements, and regulations that govern the interaction between nations in the global marketplace. One prominent example of an institutional factor that drives international trade is the European Union (EU) that created one of the largest single markets in the world through its internal market with free movement of goods, services, capital, and labor. The World Trade Organization (WTO) is yet another institutional factor that significantly shapes international trade. In 2014, the European Union established the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) which sought to provide eligible developing countries with preferential access to the European market by reducing or suspending tariffs on certain imported goods. However, since its formation, it has been questioned whether GSP (later extended to GSP+) is in accordance with the World Trade Organization (WTO) law. This paper explores the role of institutional framework in driving international trade dynamics, highlighting its impact on trade policies, market access, and economic development. In particular, we analyze whether the current EU's GSP aimed to boost sustainable development and good governance is compatible with the entrenched institutions of international trade represented by the WTO rules and laws. We find that despite some contentious elements, no disruptions can be found. Nevertheless, it is crucial for the EU to address and reform the GSP to continuously increase its effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 134
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Dynamic Amazonia: The EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement and Deforestation [J].
Arima, Eugenio ;
Barreto, Paulo ;
Taheripour, Farzad ;
Aguiar, Angel .
LAND, 2021, 10 (11)
[2]   The International Trade Regime and the Quest for Free Digital Trade [J].
Azmeh, Shamel ;
Foster, Christopher ;
Echavarri, Jaime .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2020, 22 (03) :671-692
[3]   On the widely differing effects of free trade agreements: Lessons from twenty years of trade integration [J].
Baier, Scott L. ;
Yotov, Yoto V. ;
Zylkin, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 116 :206-226
[4]   The WTO legality of the EU's GSP plus arrangement [J].
Bartels, Lorand .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW, 2007, 10 (04) :869-886
[5]   THE GROWTH AND DECAY OF CUSTOM - THE ROLE OF THE NEW INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS IN ECONOMIC-HISTORY [J].
BASU, K ;
JONES, E ;
SCHLICHT, E .
EXPLORATIONS IN ECONOMIC HISTORY, 1987, 24 (01) :1-21
[6]   The Pursuit of Non-Trade Policy Objectives in EU Trade Policy [J].
Borchert, Ingo ;
Conconi, Paola ;
Di Ubaldo, Mattia ;
Herghelegiu, Cristina .
WORLD TRADE REVIEW, 2021, 20 (05) :623-647
[7]  
Charles M., 2023, International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (IJSSHR) ISSN 2959-7056 (o)
[8]  
2959-7048 (p), P20, DOI DOI 10.61108/IJSSHR.V1I1.5
[9]   PRINCIPLES AND PERSPECTIVES FOR A DIVERSIFIED RENEWAL IN THE SYSTEM OF MODERN POLITICAL ECONOMY [J].
Cheng, Enfu .
TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2018, 16 (04) :41-49
[10]   The Problem of Social Cost [J].
Coase, R. H. .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2013, 56 (04) :837-877