Modified Vaginal Mesh Procedure with DynaMesh®-PR4 for the Treatment of Anterior/Apical Vaginal Prolapse

被引:0
作者
Lin, Chia-Ju [1 ]
Liu, Chih-Ku [1 ]
Hsieh, Hsiao-Yun [1 ]
Chen, Ming-Jer [1 ]
Tsai, Ching-Pei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
[2] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Ph D Program Translat Med, Taichung 40204, Taiwan
[3] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Rong Hsing Res Ctr Translat Med, Taichung 40204, Taiwan
关键词
female; pelvic organ prolapse; surgical mesh; uterine prolapse; vagina; cystocele; prostheses and implants; STRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE; TRANSVAGINAL MESH; REPAIR; SACROCOLPOPEXY; COLPORRHAPHY; OUTCOMES; SUPPORT; SURGERY; WOMEN; PVDF;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics13182991
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
(1) Background: Treating female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is challenging. Surgical meshes have been used in transvaginal surgeries since the 1990s, but complications such as mesh exposure and infection have been reported. Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) mesh, known for its stability and non-reactive properties, has shown promise in urogynecological surgeries. (2) Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 27 patients who underwent a modified PVDF vaginal mesh repair procedure using DynaMesh (R)-PR4 and combined trans-obturator and sacrospinous fixation techniques. Additional surgeries were performed as needed. (3) Results: The mean operation time was 56.7 min, and the mean blood loss was 66.7 mL. The average hospitalization period was 4.2 days with Foley catheter removal after 2 days. Patients experienced lower pain scores from the day of the operation to the following day. Postoperative follow-up revealed that 85.2% of patients achieved anatomic success, with 14.8% experiencing recurrent stage II cystocele. No recurrence of apical prolapse was observed. Complications were rare, with one case (3.7%) of asymptomatic mesh protrusion. (4) Conclusions: The modified vaginal mesh procedure using DynaMesh (R)-PR4 showed favorable outcomes with a short operation time, low recurrence rate, rare complications, and improved functional outcomes. This surgical option could be considered for anterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse in women.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Are Two Meshes Better than One in Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse? Comparison of Single Anterior versus Anterior and Posterior Vaginal Mesh Procedures
    d'Altilia, Nicola
    Mancini, Vito
    Falagario, Ugo
    Chirico, Marco
    Illiano, Ester
    Balzarro, Matteo
    Annese, Pasquale
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    Bettocchi, Carlo
    Cormio, Luigi
    Sanguedolce, Francesca
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Brunocilla, Eugenio
    Costantini, Elisabetta
    Carrieri, Giuseppe
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2022, 106 (03) : 282 - 290
  • [42] The Comparison of Outcomes of Transvaginal Mesh Surgery with and without Midline Fascial Plication for the Treatment of Anterior Vaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Chiang, Ching-Hsiang
    Hsu, Chun-Shuo
    Ding, Dah-Ching
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (09)
  • [43] Comparison of anterior colporrhaphy and repair with mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse
    Sukgen, Gokmen
    Kaya, Aski Ellibes
    CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 43 : 248 - 253
  • [44] Transvaginal mesh repair of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse: a clinical and ultrasonographic study
    Velemir, L.
    Amblard, J.
    Fatton, B.
    Savary, D.
    Jacquetin, B.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 35 (04) : 474 - 480
  • [45] Treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse with and without polypropylene mesh: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial - Part I
    Nunes Tamanini, Jose Tadeu
    da Mota Tamanini, Mirce Milhomem
    de Oliveira Souza Castro, Renata Cristina
    Feldner, Paulo Cezar, Jr.
    Castro, Rodrigo de Aquino
    Ferreira Sartori, Marair Gracio
    Batista Castello Girao, Manoel Joao
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2013, 39 (04): : 519 - 530
  • [46] Efficacy and safety of anterior vaginal prolapse treatment using single incision repair system: Multicentric study
    Zullo, Marzio Angelo
    Schiavi, Michele Carlo
    Luffarelli, Paolo
    Bracco, Gianluca
    Iuliano, Alessandro
    Grilli, Debora
    Esperto, Francesco
    Cervigni, Mauro
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 61 (04): : 646 - 651
  • [47] Vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral sacrospinous fixation plus an anterior mesh versus abdominal sacrocervicopexy for the treatment of primary apical prolapse in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled study
    De Castro, Edilson Benedito
    Brito, Luiz Gustavo O.
    Juliato, Cassia Raquel T.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (02) : 365 - 372
  • [48] Effect of anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair by modified transvaginal mesh surgery: a retrospective cohort study
    Hu, Pan
    Lei, Li
    Wang, Ying
    Tang, Jing
    Liu, Lubin
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2023, 307 (05) : 1513 - 1520
  • [49] A 3-year follow-up after anterior colporrhaphy compared with collagen-coated transvaginal mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomised controlled trial
    Rudnicki, M.
    Laurikainen, E.
    Pogosean, R.
    Kinne, I.
    Jakobsson, U.
    Teleman, P.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (01) : 136 - 142
  • [50] Ten years' follow-up after iliococcygeus fixation for the treatment of apical vaginal prolapse
    Serati, Maurizio
    Salvatore, Stefano
    Athanasiou, Stavros
    Scancarello, Chiara
    Ghezzi, Fabio
    Braga, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 32 (06) : 1533 - 1538