The role of proximity in the design of innovation intermediaries' business models

被引:13
作者
Delorme, Donatienne [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] EXCELIA Business Sch, La Rochelle, France
[2] Nantes Univ, LEMNA, F-44000 Nantes, France
关键词
Proximity; Business model; Innovation intermediary; Science-industry collaboration; Technology transfer; Intermediary organization; TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER OFFICES; GEOGRAPHICAL PROXIMITY; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION; ORGANIZATIONS; INDUSTRY; COLLABORATION; INSTITUTIONS; BOUNDARY; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122246
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Collaboration between science and industry is arguably more vital than ever to improve the capacity for advanced innovation and value creation. However, there is considerable diversity among the actors of innovation ecosystems, which raises the question of the roles and positions of specific actors: the innovation intermediaries. These are meant to be boundary organizations, developing proximity to favor collaborations. Spatial and non -spatial proximities are crucial in the innovation process and can be framed to better understand the role and configuration of innovation intermediaries, as well as the design of their business models. Based on a longitudinal case study of a new, atypical, intermediary organization within a French university, this research was conducted through an original perspective, articulating the business model with the proximity dimensions. The results reveal the nature and the role of proximity in the emergence and development of an innovation intermediary. The business model can frame the proximity choices and decisions. On a dynamic perspective, we reveal "proximity-making" processes shaping innovation intermediaries' business models, for their survival in complex environments. Beyond theoretical contributions, we finally present implications for universities, managers and policymakers.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy
    Adner, Ron
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2017, 43 (01) : 39 - 58
  • [2] Agogué M, 2017, J STRATEGY MANAG, V10, P19, DOI 10.1108/JSMA-01-2015-0005
  • [3] Traditional, virtual, and digital intermediaries in university-industry collaboration: exploring institutional logics and bounded rationality
    Albats, Ekaterina
    Alexander, Allen T.
    Cunningham, James A.
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 177
  • [4] Intermediaries for open innovation: A competence-based comparison of knowledge transfer offices practices
    Alexander, Allen T.
    Martin, Dominique Philippe
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2013, 80 (01) : 38 - 49
  • [5] Autio E., 2014, OXFORD HDB INNOVATIO, P204, DOI 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199694945.013.012
  • [6] Orchestrating ecosystems: a multi-layered framework
    Autio, Erkko
    [J]. INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 24 (01): : 96 - 109
  • [7] Business Models as Models
    Baden-Fuller, Charles
    Morgan, Mary S.
    [J]. LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2010, 43 (2-3) : 156 - 171
  • [8] BadenFuller C, 2015, ADV STRATEG MANAGE, V33, P1, DOI 10.1108/S0742-3322201533
  • [9] University technology transfer office business models: One size does not fit all
    Baglieri, Daniela
    Baldi, Francesco
    Tucci, Christopher L.
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2018, 76-77 : 51 - 63
  • [10] Balland P. A., 2022, Handbook of Proximity Relations, P70, DOI DOI 10.4337/9781786434784.00010