How refugees work together: the politics of solidarity and 'invisible' collective action during COVID-19

被引:4
作者
Mitra, Ankushi [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Dept Govt, Washington, DC 20057 USA
关键词
Refugees; migration; cooperation; collective action; solidarity; UNDOCUMENTED MIGRANTS; HINDU NATIONALISM; MOVEMENT; IDENTITY; INDIA; CITIZENSHIP; CONFLICT; PROTEST; CAMP;
D O I
10.1080/1369183X.2023.2191158
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Recent scholarship on refugee assistance has begun shifting the focus from traditional humanitarian interventions to alternative forms of refugee response, undertaken through more local, informal networks. These forms of humanitarian assistance and solidarity can transcend national refugee politics, and function as an alternative form of political engagement with the issue of refugee protection. Much of this emerging literature focuses on how host communities, diaspora networks, and activist groups support refugees. However, we know very little about how solidarities are generated between different refugee groups in the same host state, which has important implications for understanding the ways in which different refugee groups organise and seek to secure their own welfare in shared displacement. This study draws on evidence from India during the COVID-19 pandemic to analyze how such intergroup cooperation in exile develops. I find, first, that refugees navigate their vulnerabilities through informal, interpersonal forms of care and solidarity, which bolsters identification with shared challenges and goals. Second, such solidarities can generate collective action that helps refugees carve out certain spaces of inclusion in a larger context of structural exclusion. Third, the network structure of these solidarities is shaped by existing policy regimes and social relationships in key ways.
引用
收藏
页码:2899 / 2919
页数:21
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] Abdelaaty Lamis Elmy., 2021, Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees
  • [2] 'Immanent Nation: The Rohingya quest for international recognition'
    Abraham, Itty
    Jaehn, Miriam
    [J]. NATIONS AND NATIONALISM, 2020, 26 (04) : 1054 - 1068
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, GLOBAL TRENDS FORCED
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1996, Challenging codes. Collective action in the information age
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1990, Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2020, The Wire
  • [7] Aswani T., 2021, WIRE
  • [8] Atac I., 2015, MOVEMENTS J KRITISCH, V1, P1
  • [9] Introduction: The Contentious Politics of Refugee and Migrant Protest and Solidarity Movements: Remaking Citizenship from the Margins
    Atac, Ilker
    Rygiel, Kim
    Stierl, Maurice
    [J]. CITIZENSHIP STUDIES, 2016, 20 (05) : 527 - 544
  • [10] Urban migrant and refugee solidarity beyond city limits
    Bauder, Harald
    [J]. URBAN STUDIES, 2021, 58 (16) : 3213 - 3229