Choice of treatment evaluated after trial periods with bone conduction devices and contralateral routing of sound systems in patients with single-sided deafness

被引:6
|
作者
Wendrich, Anne W. W. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
van Heteren, Jan A. A. [1 ,2 ]
Peters, Jeroen P. M. [1 ,2 ]
Cattani, Guido [1 ,3 ]
Stokroos, Robert J. J. [1 ,2 ]
Versnel, Huib [1 ,2 ]
Smit, Adriana L. L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol & Head & Neck Surg, Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med, UMC Utrecht Brain Ctr, Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Adelante Ctr Expertise Rehabil & Audiol, Hoensbroek, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol & Head & Neck Surg, Ctr Utrecht, House Postal G05 129,POB 85500, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY | 2023年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
bone conduction device; contralateral routing of sound; randomized controlled trial; single-sided deafness; trial period; SENSORINEURAL HEARING-LOSS; UNILATERAL DEAFNESS; BAHA; ADULTS; AID; SURGERY; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1002/lio2.1002
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
ObjectivesPatients with single-sided deafness (SSD) may experience difficulties with speech perception in noise, sound localization, have tinnitus and experience a reduced quality of life (QoL). contralateral routing of sound hearing aids (CROS) or bone conduction devices (BCD) may partly improve subjective speech communication and QoL in SSD patients. A trial period with these devices can help in making a well-informed choice of treatment. Our aim was to evaluate factors influencing the choice of treatment made after a BCD and CROS trial period in adult SSD patients.MethodsPatients were randomized in the: "first BCD, then CROS " or "first CROS, then BCD " trial period group. After the BCD on headband and CROS were tested for 6 weeks each, patients choose for BCD, CROS or no treatment. Primary outcome was the distribution of choice of treatment. Secondary outcomes included the association between the choice of treatment and patient characteristics, reasons for treatment acceptance or rejection, device usage during the trial periods, and disease-specific QoL outcomes.ResultsOf 91 patients randomized, 84 completed both trial periods and made their choice of treatment: 25 (30%) BCD, 34 (40%) CROS, and 25 (30%) no treatment. No characteristics were found to be related to choice of treatment. Top three reasons for acceptance or rejection were: device (dis)comfort, sound quality and (dis)advantage of subjective hearing. Average daily device use during the trial periods was higher for CROS than for BCD. Choice of treatment was significantly related with both duration of device usage and greater improvement of QoL after the corresponding trial period.ConclusionThe majority of SSD patients preferred BCD or CROS over no treatment. Evaluating device usage, discussing treatment (dis)advantages and disease-specific QoL outcomes after trial periods are to be considered during patient counseling and could facilitate whether to choose one of these treatments.Level of evidence1B.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 200
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Review: Bone Conduction Devices and Contralateral Routing of Sound Systems in Single-Sided Deafness
    Peters, Jeroen P. M.
    Smit, Adriana L.
    Stegeman, Inge
    Grolman, Wilko
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 (01) : 218 - 226
  • [2] Tinnitus reduction in patients with single-sided deafness: the effect of cochlear implantation, bone conduction devices, and contralateral routing of sound hearing aids investigated in a randomized controlled trial
    Wendrich, Anne W.
    Assouly, Kelly K. S.
    van Heteren, Jan A. A.
    Peters, Jeroen P. M.
    Grolman, Wilko
    Stokroos, Robert J.
    Versnel, Huib
    Smit, Adriana L.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [3] Systematic Review on the Trial Period for Bone Conduction Devices in Single-Sided Deafness: Rates and Reasons for Rejection
    Wendrich, Anne W.
    Kroese, Tiuri E.
    Peters, Jeroen P. M.
    Cattani, Guido
    Grolman, Wilko
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2017, 38 (05) : 632 - 641
  • [4] Single-Sided Deafness and Hearing Rehabilitation Modalities: Contralateral Routing of Signal Devices, Bone Conduction Devices, and Cochlear Implants
    Pantaleo, Alessandra
    Murri, Alessandra
    Cavallaro, Giada
    Pontillo, Vito
    Auricchio, Debora
    Quaranta, Nicola
    Rubio, Maria E.
    Bidelman, Gavin M.
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [5] Contralateral Routing of Signal Hearing Aid versus Transcutaneous Bone Conduction in Single-Sided Deafness
    Leterme, Gaelle
    Bernardeschi, Daniele
    Bensemman, Anissa
    Coudert, Cyrille
    Portal, Jean-Jacques
    Ferrary, Evelyne
    Sterkers, Olivier
    Vicaut, Eric
    Frachet, Bruno
    Grayeli, Alexis Bozorg
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2015, 20 (04) : 251 - 260
  • [6] Sound Localization in Single-Sided Deafness; Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial on the Comparison Between Cochlear Implantation, Bone Conduction Devices, and Contralateral Routing of Signals Hearing Aids
    van Heteren, Jan A. A.
    van Oorschot, Hanneke D.
    Wendrich, Anne W.
    Peters, Jeroen P. M.
    Rhebergen, Koenraad S.
    Grolman, Wilko
    Stokroos, Robert J.
    Smit, Adriana L.
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2024, 28
  • [7] Sound-localization performance of patients with single-sided deafness is not improved when listening with a bone-conduction device
    Agterberg, Martijn J. H.
    Snik, Ad F. M.
    Van de Goor, Rens M. G.
    Hol, Myrthe K. S.
    Van Opstal, A. John
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2019, 372 : 62 - 68
  • [8] Short-term outcomes of cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness compared to bone conduction devices and contralateral routing of sound hearing aids-Results of a Randomised controlled trial (CINGLE-trial)
    Peters, Jeroen P. M.
    van Heteren, Jan A. A.
    Wendrich, Anne W.
    van Zanten, Gijsbert A.
    Grolman, Wilko
    Stokroos, Robert J.
    Smit, Adriana L.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (10):
  • [9] Analysis of Factors Predicting the Success of the Bone Conduction Device Heaband Trial in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness
    Faber, Hubert T.
    Kievit, Hanneke
    de Wolf, Maarten J. F.
    Cremers, Cor W. R. J.
    Snik, Ad F. M.
    Hol, Myrthe K. S.
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2012, 138 (12) : 1129 - 1135
  • [10] Comparison of 2 Implantable Bone Conduction Devices in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness Using a Daily Alternating Method
    Desmet, Jolien Brigit Johan
    Wouters, Kristien
    De Bodt, Marc
    Van de Heyning, Paul
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2012, 33 (06) : 1018 - 1026